Be assured that I did not state that I opposed the project, nor do I now oppose the project. I stated my disbelief that it would suceed. Perhaps that is your misunderstanding. It would appear that you equate my skepticism with opposition, where it is simply untrue. However, you have convinced others that I feel threatened, even though I am not. Such is the power of the written word.
"Silly point. -- Tell that to millions of our immigrant forefathers. And the constitutional basics of our free republic are not 'experimentation'. These basics would be followed. "
Our immigrant forefathers had the fortitude to back up their convictions and principles with actions. Today's citizens (regardless of political orientation) do not. Also I never said the 'constitutional basics of our free republic' was experimentation. (your words) It is the implementation of said basics onto a populace already dependent on the federal government's teat that is the experiment. "Somehow, I just can't take your word on "trying", judging from your general anti-libertarian stance. Sorry."
Apology accepted. :) And thanks for not calling me names or sarcastically slandering my statements. (Seriously)
Silly point. -- Tell that to millions of our immigrant forefathers.
And the constitutional basics of our free republic are not 'experimentation'. These basics would be followed.
Our immigrant forefathers had the fortitude to back up their convictions and principles with actions. Today's citizens (regardless of political orientation) do not.
Your pronouncements have no basis in fact. - But we shall see.
Also I never said the 'constitutional basics of our free republic' was experimentation.
- Of course you didn't.
You said that people would 'experiment'. - They would not, as they'd be bound by the 'constitutional basics of our free republic'.
Try to learn the logic of debate.