Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug Czar on Anti-Marijuana Crusade
The Week Online ^ | September 20, 2002 | Phil Smith

Posted on 09/21/2002 12:48:11 PM PDT by The FRugitive

DRUG CZAR ON ANTI-MARIJUANA CRUSADE

THREATENS CANADA, UNLEASHES NEW PROPAGANDA OFFENSIVE

Drug czar John Walters is a busy man these days. Between engineering yet another installment in the Office of National Drug Control Strategy's ( ONDCP ) bizarre series of ads linking marijuana users to terrorism and violence, trotting out a new offensive aimed at curbing teen pot use, trying to put out brush fires in places like California and Nevada, and threatening to disrupt cross-border trade with Canada if marijuana were legalized there, Walters appears to have a full-blown case of marijuana mania.

The New Ad Campaign:

Beginning this week, TV viewers around the country are being treated to the latest version of the notorious Superbowl "drugs aid terror" commercials, this time targeting marijuana. The text of one ad is as follows: "This is Dan. This is the joint that Dan bought. This is the dealer that sold the joint that Dan bought. This is the smuggler that smuggled the pot to the dealer who sold the joint that Dan bought. This is the cartel that uses the smuggler that smuggled the pot to the dealer who sold the joint that Dan bought. And this is the family that was lined up by Dan's cartel and shot for getting in the way."

A second ad features teen pot-smoker "Stacey," then shows an image of her dealer, then moves up the chain to the person who supplies the dealer. But the final image is of a bed-ridden woman: "This is Carla, who was hit by a stray bullet from Stacey's supplier and paralyzed for life," the voiceover intones ominously.

Walters, who recently had to announce that earlier ONDCP propaganda campaigns had flopped, said this one was different. "These ads are different," he told Good Morning America as part of his media blitz. "We toughened up the behavior not only to look at the harms drugs can do to young people, but using their idealism, their drug buying to things they care about."

But Good Morning America also talked to young people about the ads, and some of their responses cannot be encouraging for Walters. Elisa Roupenian, a college student interviewed on the program, said her friends objected to linking drug use here to violence in other countries. "It made people mad because they pointed the finger at teenagers," she said. "Some people think that if the government didn't create the war against drugs that made such a huge black market, the terrorists and the drug cartels wouldn't be able to make such a tremendous profit," she said.

Nevertheless, expect more such ads to follow. The drug czar has a $1 billion propaganda budget for the next five years.

The New Anti-Marijuana Campaign Directed at Parents:

Walters and Surgeon General Richard Carmona on Tuesday kicked off this new effort with a Washington, DC, press conference and an "open letter" advertisement that began appearing in newspapers around the country this week.

"Did You Know? Marijuana puts kids at risk," the copy reads. "It is the most widely used illicit drug among youth today and is more potent than ever. Marijuana use can lead to a host of significant health, social, learning and behavioral problems at a crucial time in a young person's development. Getting high also impairs judgment, which can wreak havoc on teens in high-pressure social situations, leading to risky decision-making on issues like sex, criminal activity or riding with someone who is driving high. And don't be fooled by popular beliefs. Kids can get hooked on pot. Research shows that marijuana use can lead to addiction. More teens enter treatment for marijuana abuse each year than for all other illicit drugs combined."

"There's a myth that marijuana isn't as dangerous as smoking," asserted Carmona at the press conference. "That's not true. It's dangerous and addictive." Carmona and Walters were able to get 17 national medical, educational, and anti-drug groups to sign onto their letter, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the National PTA.

The DC dog and pony show was interrupted, however, when DC Statehood Party candidate Adam Eidinger jumped onstage as Walters spoke. Holding a sign saying "Free Bryan Epis," the California medical marijuana provider scheduled to be sentenced to federal prison next month, Eidinger denounced the prosecution of Epis and the persecution of medical marijuana users, throwing out flyers until he was ejected by Secret Service agents ( http://www.drugwar.com/pczarinterrupted.shtm ).

Fighting Marijuana Initiatives:

Walters also announced this week that he plans at least three trips to Nevada to lobby against that state's initiative to remove civil and criminal penalties for the possession of up to three ounces of marijuana.

Threatening Canada:

Aside from accusing the Canadian Senate's panel that recommended legalizing marijuana of being fools, Walters has also blustered about the impact Canadian legalization could have on cross-border trade. Walters called the Canadians "naive" to believe that marijuana has any medical uses. "The claim that marijuana is an efficacious medicine is a lie," he told a Detroit news conference. "It is used by people who want to legalize marijuana, cynically."

In his Detroit appearance Walters warned that the US would take unspecified additional actions at the border if Canada legalized pot. "We will do what is necessary to protect this country," he said.

Throughout the past two weeks Walters has repeatedly made such claims as "marijuana is a dangerous drug," "American drug users contribute to terrorism," that US pot prohibition is based on scientific evidence, and "today more young people are being admitted and presented for treatment of marijuana than for alcohol."

While some academics, activists and drug reformers are attempting a point-by-point rebuttal of Walters' lies, half-truths, and distortions, others are arguing that it is an exercise in futility.

"Walters is a rabid dog and chronic pathological liar," said NORML's Allen St. Pierre. "But the drug reform movement does not have the media access to rebut him line by line, except on the Internet," he told DRCNet. "He is a bullshit factory; to reply in kind would take too long and wouldn't be heard."

That doesn't mean the movement should just lie back and let itself be slandered, St. Pierre said. "We can respond in two ways. First, everyone who thinks this campaign is stupid and a waste of money can get on the phone and tell Congress to cut funding," he suggested. "We can also contact the media that are running these ads and threaten to boycott them. We can write letters saying, 'I saw you run this ad and I will not tolerate it and I will boycott your stations and tell your other advertisers that I'm not seeing their ads because I'm not watching your stations,'" St. Pierre suggested.

For Kevin Zeese of Common Sense for Drug Policy, the anti-pot offensive is a sign that the prohibitionists are running scared. "They know they're losing the education war on marijuana. With a higher percentage of the population having had personal experience with marijuana as the population ages, the public is catching onto the truth," he told DRCNet. "So Walters has to resort to false statements. What they don't want to face up to is the fact that no matter how safe or unsafe a drug is, the sensible policy option in to bring it within the law, regulate it and control it."

The debate about marijuana's safety is irrelevant, Zeese argued. "All of these claims have been refuted before," he said. "We have to focus on the reality that the most sensible policy is legal control."


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: drugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last
To: Roscoe
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." --Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1791. ME 8:276
161 posted on 09/21/2002 7:00:26 PM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Biographer: Carl Sagan Drew Inspiration From Getting High

Thank God I got out and exited the drug culture.

Good thing too, else you might have gotten myelodysplasia (preleukemia syndrome) like Dr. Sagan did.
Or does pot do that ?

162 posted on 09/21/2002 7:00:41 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
You have the right to not do drugs.

I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual." --Thomas Jefferson
163 posted on 09/21/2002 7:02:18 PM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: KDD
"This conduct consists, first, in not injuring the interests of one another; or rather certain interests, which, either by express legal provision or by tacit understanding, ought to be considered as rights; and secondly, in each person's bearing his share (to be fixed on some equitable principle) of the labors and sacrifices incurred for defending the society or its members from injury and molestation. These conditions society is justified in enforcing, at all costs to those who endeavor to withhold fulfilment. Nor is this all that society may do.

Did you read this before you posted it?

164 posted on 09/21/2002 7:03:16 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: KDD
You have the right to not do drugs.

And you don't have the right to do illicit drugs.

165 posted on 09/21/2002 7:04:22 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
I know many pot smokers. I even employ a few. How do these men smoking a weed in the privacy of their homes affect you? How do they molest or otherwise injure you?
166 posted on 09/21/2002 7:07:43 PM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: KDD
I know many pot smokers. I even employ a few. How do these men smoking a weed in the privacy of their homes affect you?

Where did they buy it? Who do they sell it to? Do they have drivers licenses? What other illicit drugs do they use? How do you know?

167 posted on 09/21/2002 7:12:28 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
The laws on marijuana will be changed Roscoe. If more people who thought like you aired their views, the laws would change quicker as people realize what kind of people support the WOD's. Walters ads will futher alienate our young people from the political arena. You and Walters and such ilk come off as moralists...something Americans will not stand for long. I do not drink alcohol or smoke pot but people with rigid moral values that they would force on people under threat of the gun cause me to ally with the targets of such police state mentalities. Let's see what happens in Nevada. In all of history, prohibition has failed without fail. Why do people like you persist?
168 posted on 09/21/2002 7:23:31 PM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Good night...busybody.
169 posted on 09/21/2002 7:25:13 PM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: KDD
Let's see what happens in Nevada.

Let's.

170 posted on 09/21/2002 7:27:14 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: KDD

In all of history, prohibition has failed without fail.

Simply because truth/honesty always outlives the lie/dishonesty.

Night KDD, I too am out of here.

171 posted on 09/21/2002 7:58:07 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: KDD
Explain the discrepancy.

Alcohol is more disinhibiting of the animal side it seems. Any who have experience with it could tell you stories of watching a friend morph from Dr. Jeckyll into Mr. Hyde. I don't deny it is a powerful and potentially dangerous drug.

Would you support the re-instatement of alcohol prohibition. If not...why not?

No, I would not. Alcohol use (and abuse) is already established and we more or less have a framework for dealing with it. Pot use (and abuse) effects on a large scale are largely unknown, and frankly I don't see why we should risk trying to find out what the costs are.

172 posted on 09/21/2002 8:19:11 PM PDT by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Zon
i don't consider caffiene, nicotine, sugar, chocolate, etc. to be intoxicants...and i'd be happy to see alcohol outlawed.
173 posted on 09/21/2002 9:15:42 PM PDT by northislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: northislander
Instead of outlawing all those substances, why not outlaw the practice of government stealing your money to enable destructive behavior?

Besides, if you don't think nicotine is psychoactive you should try to take a cigarette away from me first thing in the morning. You would see that nicotine addiction is very real, and manifests itself in a much more violent manner than any desire to smoke some cannabis flowers ever could.
174 posted on 09/21/2002 9:34:20 PM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: northislander
i don't consider caffiene, nicotine, sugar, chocolate, etc. to be intoxicants...and i'd be happy to see alcohol outlawed.

Dude. No way. I was drinking 2-3 20 oz. bottles of diet coke a day up until Friday because on Thursday I was so jittery from the caffeine i could hardly sit still. The next day i didn't drink any. I had the most awful headache that not even Tylenol or asprin could relieve. I was lethargic. Caffeine is absolutely an intoxicant. I've stopped smoking marijuana for days, weeks and never had anything close to that happen. Stop caffeine for a day and I'm in for a treat. Same would apply to many people I'm sure.

175 posted on 09/21/2002 9:57:41 PM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: All
I am defining an intoxicant as a chemical compound capable of producing narcotic effects broadly understood as drunkeness. I am not interested in discussing your particular reactions to common food substances or nicotine as those are not reasonably related to the subject of this discussion.
176 posted on 09/21/2002 10:50:42 PM PDT by northislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: northislander

and i'd be happy to see alcohol outlawed.

That's a keeper. If alcohol was outlawed, what sentence do you think the court should hand down to a person caught with a case of whiskey? What about a person caught with an ounce of marijuana; what sentence do you think they should get?

177 posted on 09/21/2002 10:58:42 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I'd rather have a conversation with Carl Sagan then you Dane thats for sure.
178 posted on 09/21/2002 11:50:08 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
Don't use pot but I occasionally use lotsa caffiene( I don't normally use any at all) to stay up for test and I'll agree. Use caffiene for one day then stop and you get a headache from hell.
179 posted on 09/21/2002 11:53:22 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: northislander
and i'd be happy to see alcohol outlawed

Umm, we tried that already. What makes you think the results would be any better today?

180 posted on 09/21/2002 11:58:06 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson