To: WyldKard
closing up their ears, and screaming out so loud that they refuse to listen to the other side.I've listened to the other side. I enjoy reading these drug threads, so far no one has convinced me yet that there is an upside to what you advocate.
33 posted on
09/11/2002 5:31:51 AM PDT by
ladtx
To: ladtx
I enjoy reading these drug threads, so far no one has convinced me yet that there is an upside to what you advocate.
Well, let me ask you this: WOuld you be in favor of ending the Federal WoD, which depends on a "New Deal" misinterpretation of the Constitution, and instead allow individual states to address the matter on their own, as per the 10th Amendment? As was how things USED to be done before the 1930's?
35 posted on
09/11/2002 5:35:25 AM PDT by
WyldKard
To: ladtx
I've listened to the other side. I enjoy reading these drug threads, so far no one has convinced me yet that there is an upside to what you advocate.
You don't think there's an upside to reigning in a ridiculous New Deal-era interpretation of the Commerce Clause that gives the Federal government the "power" to declare any noun illegal?
To: ladtx
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson