[dubyagee]

But there is no genuine scientific rebuttal yet found to evolution. If there were, it would be big news, and big science would study it.

Scientists reject anything that leads to evidence of creation, ie. the placement of earth in the universe, the order of the universe. If you reject the evidence of design, simply because you can say 'well, what is design', you are rejecting evidence before your very nose.

[jim35]

"But there is no genuine scientific rebuttal yet found to evolution. If there were, it would be big news, and big science would study it."


Unless you consider that it has become so ingrained in the society of scientists, that it is too sacred a cow to be questioned, and that any who do are punished and ridiculed, and see their careers go down the drain. This is one of the oldest traditions in science, going way back.

[Doctor Stochastic]

Please show some evidence of creation. Perhaps you could give an example of something created versus something not created to show that your claims are not meaningless.

Your attacks on scientists are completely unwarranted. This sort of blanket attack is like saying "All Republicans are Racists." It only shows the lack of substance in your own position.

[VadeRetro]

Scientists reject anything that leads to evidence of creation, ie. the placement of earth in the universe . . .

Just where do you think we are in the universe? A garden-variety star in a spiral arm of a garden-variety galaxy. And, before you bother, if the neighborhood didn't support life, life wouldn't be here.