TALE OF TWO LAWERS (Feldmand vs. Dusek) DEFEATED and DECIETFUL.(VD's SKATE FREE TO SWING AGAIN)

Yahoo ^ | August 22, 2002 | Yahoo

[Politicalmom]

Why didn't you TELL me that you are a "chap"???

I am so disillusioned.....

[Politicalmom]

Why didn't you TELL me that you are a "chap"???

I am so disillusioned.....

[MizSterious]

According to Dusek, they don't have to say how, we just have to accept that he did it.

Now, there's a piece of work for you. And the jury apparently bought that argument.

[FresnoDA]

Miz??? GOT AIM??? FresnoDA

[MizSterious]

Hildy can't tell the difference. That tells us a lot about Hildy right there. (My husband would be tremendously disappointed, also!)

[MizSterious]

If you haven't done so already, be sure to check the "keywords" at the top of the thread. Fresno, ya dun good! (but no iced tea spew alert, wahhh!)

[Lucky]

Maybe our threads could be written up like this: The Westerfield Case, August 23rd, 2002. Then followed by a list of the facts and our explanations. Any jackel that appears could then be pointed to the list. What do you think?

[MizSterious]

I just couldn't resist adding "knobs"....

[Jaded]

Um, you forgot that he stayed INSIDE the house for over an hour, too and left NO TRACE, or SCENT.

The verdict served to reinforce what some think of the Left Coast. M'apologies to those of you who are forced to live there.

[Valpal1]

Defense lawyer Steven Feldman has asked for a "Phillips hearing" to try to keep evidence from being presented to the jury.

A Phillips hearing is held when prosecutors have evidence, such as police reports or witness testimony, of a separate criminal or violent act or threat of a violent act that occurred before the crime for which the defendant is now charged or convicted.

I can't believe the way you all ignore this important little tidbit. Better prepare to have your SaveDave delusions shattered yet again.

[kayti]

You are LYING. There were about 87 "questionable" pics.

Was it determined how many of these were DELETED? I know some of them were. Isn't it scary that you can delete files from your computer, they remain on your harddrive and you are fried for it!

[Jaded]

I believe it's closed. It a "Phillips Hearing". Admissability/ relevance of witnesses in the penalty phase.

[MizSterious]

Personally, I can't believe you're still trolling. Are you and Hildy obsessed with us? Can't get us out of your minds? Maybe you need counseling?

[MizSterious]

Ahh, thank you. I can turn off Court TV then. Hate that channel.

[kayti]

I can't believe the way you all ignore this important little tidbit. Better prepare to have your SaveDave delusions shattered yet again.

Think we're just waiting for the FACTS to be presented. Not rushing to judgment becausing a hearing is happening, like some.

[FresnoDA]

OFFICIAL THREADJACKAL

SMOKEY ROOM WARNING

If you have surfed to this thread by accident, please
be advised that all posts are operating under the Free Republic
SMOKE FILLED ROOM Rules Of Engagement.

No Profanity,

No Racism,

No Violence....

OTHERWISE!!!!

---

YOU JACKALS ARE FLEA INFESTED CROOKED TOOTHED SWING VOTERS.....

[Hildy]

I actually do have a scenario in my mind. Here goes: Westerfield, by his own admission, was drunk. The prosecution touched on him having a drinking problem. (I think the Prosecution wanted to stay away from this if they could to avoid later penalty problems). I know something about alcoholics. I am a recovering one. Westerfield had been scorned at the bar by these women. He was still reeling by Susan, who had broken up with him earlier (Apparently. it had something to do with his drinking). He had this child sex fantasy thing. Up until that moment, it was just a fantasy. I think DW was in a blackout or semi-blackout or just blindly drunk. He wondered over to the VD home thinking he could see something or be invited to what he believed was going to be an orgy. When you are that drunk, believe me, even the most outrageous thing seems reasonable to you. I think somehow Danielle was awoken and wondered downstairs and when not seeing anyone around, wondered outside through the open door. I think it was a snap decision for Westerfield, a crime of opportunity, unplanned. He saw her, he grabbed her and the rest is history.

[MizSterious]

Kayti, Val's idol (idle?), Beth Karas just said that past violent crimes could be one of the things brought up in this hearing, not that it was the topic of this hearing. So we'll wait and see--Val has been (very) wrong before, like her many claims about "police procedures"--most of which were not followed in this case. (And it's been verified that they weren't.)

[kayti]

< I know something about alcoholics. I am a recovering one. /I>

From your posts this morning.... don't think you've quite made it there yet.

[Rheo]

When he grabbed her....where did he take her?

Not clear on how the multi colored fibers found on her body and the red fibers found under her nails, were not found in the SUV, his house or the MH?

How did he keep her hair from being anywhere in the MH but the sink drain trap, along with other blonde hairs, not hers?