Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mudd Denies Access To Transcripts As Well As Lineage To Hussein: Van Dams' Sex Life Still In Play!
Union Tribune ^ | August 19, 2002 | San Diego Tribune

Posted on 08/19/2002 4:16:26 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Mudd denies access to transcripts of closed hearings as well as lineage to Hussein


SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 19, 2002

Video WITH VIDEO
Judge William D. Mudd addressed counsel on a motion by defense attorney Steven Feldman regarding media access to jurors in the trial of defendant David Westerfield at San Diego courthouse, August 15, 2002. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home, last February.  REUTERS/POOL/Dan TrevanWith the jury completing its eighth day of deliberations without a veredict in the kidnap-murder trial of David Westerfield, the judge in the case has denied a media request to unseal transcripts of closed hearings.

The motion before Superior Court Judge William Mudd was filed by Guylyn Cummings, the attorney who represents the San Diego Union-Tribune and other media companies.

During the trial, a number of hearings were held outside of public view. Mudd denied the motion, reasoning that the jury was continuing to deliberate in the case and to ensure that "this deliberating jury is not exposed to any more publicity than they're already exposed to."

The jury should be free of a "deluge" of items that were not allowed in the trial, the judge said.

"I don't need the headaches," Mudd said, referring to seeing stories about the closed hearings in The San Diego Union-Tribune.

Mudd lashed out after an editorial in Saturday's Union-Tribune criticized his decision to banish a radio producer from the trial because the station she worked for aired the contents of a closed hearing.

The judge said he "had no idea" that he was the "Saddam Hussein" of the First Amendment in San Diego. The editorial, titled "Judge's overreach," does not mention Saddam Hussein or make allusions to the Iraqui leader. Read the full editorial here.

He said making the sealed transcripts public would cause prejudice that would be "hard to compute."

Mudd said he had no reason to believe that the media would use good judgment in reporting the contents of the closed hearings if it were to be released.

"What the public has heard is what the jurors have heard," the judge said.

Back to work
The jury returned to the San Diego County Courthouse in an attempt to decide the fate of the man accused of killing Danielle van Dam.

In all, Westerfield, 50, is charged with murder, kidnapping and misdemeanor possession of child pornography in connection with the death of the 7-year-old.

As of this morning, jurors had deliberated about 31 hours over seven days.

The twice-divorced, self-employed design engineer could face the death penalty if the jury convicts him of killing his Sabre Springs neighbor and finds true a special circumstance allegation that the second-grader's murder occurred during a kidnapping.

Brenda van Dam discovered her daughter missing from her bed the morning of Feb. 2.

On Friday, the jury asked for a readback of the testimony of San Diego County Medical Examiner Brian Blackbourne and insect expert David Faulkner.

Blackbourne and Faulkner were among a group of witnesses who testified about how insects found on the child's body could help determine when she had been dumped off an East County road near Dehesa.

Faulkner, a forensic entomologist, found 14 insect species on the girl's body when he examined it at the East County recovery site.

The witness testified that fly larvae first infested the body 10-12 days before volunteer searchers discovered it on Feb. 27.

On cross-examination by prosecutors, Faulkner conceded that he could not give a maximum time Danielle's body was exposed to the elements. Blackbourne testified that the body was in an advanced state of decomposition and that animals had been feeding on it.

He testified that Danielle died between Feb. 1 and Feb. 18.

Other experts testified that insects infested the body as little as four days before it was discovered to six weeks earlier.

Jurors also have asked for readback of the testimony of San Diego police criminalist Jennifer Shen when she was recalled to answer questions about orange fibers that allegedly link Westerfield to the victim.

Shen testified that orange fibers found wrapped in Danielle's choker matched orange fibers found in Westerfield's laundry. More orange fibers were found on a pillow case in the defendant's master bedroom.

During her second time on the witness stand, Shen acknowledged that if she had known that witnesses at a Poway bar said Westerfield and Danielle's mother had been ``dirty dancing,'' it would have influenced her evaluation of the fiber evidence.

Shen also told prosecutors that the amount of orange fibers found in Westerfield's SUV, home and motorhome made it unlikely the fibers were transferred from a third party.

Jurors also have reviewed the pornographic evidence in the case and asked to look at photographs that Westerfield had taken of his ex-girlfriend's teen- age daughter. Prosecutors told the jury that one photo of the daughter lying by the pool was sexually suggestive.

Jurors also listened again to a taped interview the defendant gave to a police interrogation specialist on Feb. 4.

Nearly 100 witnesses were called during the two-month trial.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandamswingers; westerfieldrailroad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-391 next last
To: ican'tbelieveit
2 minutes apart you could be switching names in that time. Try posting at the same time 1 minute from now....
241 posted on 08/20/2002 1:00:48 PM PDT by clearvision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: kayti; Jrabbit; All
Please, don't tell me the new rule of etiquette on FR is we can only post to someone who has posted to us? Is THIS next?

I'm a goner...for sure..sheeze!

sw

242 posted on 08/20/2002 1:01:26 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
From the 'other thread'

To: kayti; All

Take it to the Smokey Backroom or face suspension.

682 posted on 8/20/02 11:37 AM Pacific by Admin Moderator [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

243 posted on 08/20/2002 1:03:19 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
Not Kim! She won't allow porn and since I don't think DW is guilty then it only stands to reason that I like and approve of porn.
244 posted on 08/20/2002 1:03:20 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
I believe they were educated in the public school system, where self-esteem has higher priority than truth, honesty, and justice.

"Nice" means being able to spew forth lies while telling the other side to "prove it". It means mis-stating facts as if it were sworn testimony. It means cheating on your homework and hoping the other guy does it for you.
245 posted on 08/20/2002 1:04:09 PM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Phyllis
See, "pressure" does happen.

Does, will, and most likely, in this case, was the reason DW is facing TRIAL.

246 posted on 08/20/2002 1:06:13 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Phyllis
P.S. Thank you for providing some insightful, related information!
247 posted on 08/20/2002 1:07:22 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
You broccoli headed porn lover you!!! (Just kidding, HUGGZZZ)
248 posted on 08/20/2002 1:07:29 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
There was a part in there about the chemicals attaching to the surface. But a sun bleach only fades out the color, where a chemical bleach will actually affect the exterior of what is being bleached.
249 posted on 08/20/2002 1:08:01 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Only in Kim's world!!
250 posted on 08/20/2002 1:08:24 PM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I'm here, I'm here!! (Now I sound like a confused Fres!)
251 posted on 08/20/2002 1:09:15 PM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
This is like the Star Trek with the bearded, evil Spock. Over in the 'nice' Gen Interest thread, flamethrowers seem to be the debating tool of choice; meanwhile, here in the 'naughty' Backroom we're having a (somewhat) pleasant chat.

Yeah, kinda funny. I noticed that too.!

252 posted on 08/20/2002 1:11:13 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
Kim seems to have a hang up with KIDDIE porn, as she puts it. But, from what I have read in her posts she doesn't understand the legal obligations of proof of KIDDIE porn. It is not just a person under the age of 18.

Wonder if she considers her OBSESSION post the other day porn? Hmmmm.
253 posted on 08/20/2002 1:11:43 PM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Just had to get that DIGgler in didn't you? LOL
254 posted on 08/20/2002 1:11:50 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
I am sorry but, about that hair thing. What the hell is up with the picture of a hair against a white background being "compared" to another hair on a pinkish/orange background?

If I was a member of the jury I would JUST HAVE to get up and point out.
"Haven't ANY of you people EVER watched Sesame Street?" WELL?
Then sing it with me, "one of these things IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER!"
255 posted on 08/20/2002 1:11:57 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Really? What on earth would YOU be "figuring"? That you whined until some poor duped moderator finally locked the thread for you? Bwhahahahahaha!
256 posted on 08/20/2002 1:13:17 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: alexandria
What the hell is up with the picture of a hair against a white background being "compared" to another hair on a pinkish/orange background? Think they are hoping the jury doesn't notice the background and the slightly different size.
257 posted on 08/20/2002 1:14:25 PM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I thought that if things got too hot over there, the Admins were going to MOVE the entire thread over to Smokey Backroom.

It would be a cryin shame if that happened...GRINS..

sw

258 posted on 08/20/2002 1:15:11 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

Comment #259 Removed by Moderator

To: alexandria
That reminds me of all of the "before and after" pics on some products.
260 posted on 08/20/2002 1:18:11 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson