Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mudd Denies Access To Transcripts As Well As Lineage To Hussein: Van Dams' Sex Life Still In Play!
Union Tribune ^ | August 19, 2002 | San Diego Tribune

Posted on 08/19/2002 4:16:26 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Mudd denies access to transcripts of closed hearings as well as lineage to Hussein


SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 19, 2002

Video WITH VIDEO
Judge William D. Mudd addressed counsel on a motion by defense attorney Steven Feldman regarding media access to jurors in the trial of defendant David Westerfield at San Diego courthouse, August 15, 2002. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home, last February.  REUTERS/POOL/Dan TrevanWith the jury completing its eighth day of deliberations without a veredict in the kidnap-murder trial of David Westerfield, the judge in the case has denied a media request to unseal transcripts of closed hearings.

The motion before Superior Court Judge William Mudd was filed by Guylyn Cummings, the attorney who represents the San Diego Union-Tribune and other media companies.

During the trial, a number of hearings were held outside of public view. Mudd denied the motion, reasoning that the jury was continuing to deliberate in the case and to ensure that "this deliberating jury is not exposed to any more publicity than they're already exposed to."

The jury should be free of a "deluge" of items that were not allowed in the trial, the judge said.

"I don't need the headaches," Mudd said, referring to seeing stories about the closed hearings in The San Diego Union-Tribune.

Mudd lashed out after an editorial in Saturday's Union-Tribune criticized his decision to banish a radio producer from the trial because the station she worked for aired the contents of a closed hearing.

The judge said he "had no idea" that he was the "Saddam Hussein" of the First Amendment in San Diego. The editorial, titled "Judge's overreach," does not mention Saddam Hussein or make allusions to the Iraqui leader. Read the full editorial here.

He said making the sealed transcripts public would cause prejudice that would be "hard to compute."

Mudd said he had no reason to believe that the media would use good judgment in reporting the contents of the closed hearings if it were to be released.

"What the public has heard is what the jurors have heard," the judge said.

Back to work
The jury returned to the San Diego County Courthouse in an attempt to decide the fate of the man accused of killing Danielle van Dam.

In all, Westerfield, 50, is charged with murder, kidnapping and misdemeanor possession of child pornography in connection with the death of the 7-year-old.

As of this morning, jurors had deliberated about 31 hours over seven days.

The twice-divorced, self-employed design engineer could face the death penalty if the jury convicts him of killing his Sabre Springs neighbor and finds true a special circumstance allegation that the second-grader's murder occurred during a kidnapping.

Brenda van Dam discovered her daughter missing from her bed the morning of Feb. 2.

On Friday, the jury asked for a readback of the testimony of San Diego County Medical Examiner Brian Blackbourne and insect expert David Faulkner.

Blackbourne and Faulkner were among a group of witnesses who testified about how insects found on the child's body could help determine when she had been dumped off an East County road near Dehesa.

Faulkner, a forensic entomologist, found 14 insect species on the girl's body when he examined it at the East County recovery site.

The witness testified that fly larvae first infested the body 10-12 days before volunteer searchers discovered it on Feb. 27.

On cross-examination by prosecutors, Faulkner conceded that he could not give a maximum time Danielle's body was exposed to the elements. Blackbourne testified that the body was in an advanced state of decomposition and that animals had been feeding on it.

He testified that Danielle died between Feb. 1 and Feb. 18.

Other experts testified that insects infested the body as little as four days before it was discovered to six weeks earlier.

Jurors also have asked for readback of the testimony of San Diego police criminalist Jennifer Shen when she was recalled to answer questions about orange fibers that allegedly link Westerfield to the victim.

Shen testified that orange fibers found wrapped in Danielle's choker matched orange fibers found in Westerfield's laundry. More orange fibers were found on a pillow case in the defendant's master bedroom.

During her second time on the witness stand, Shen acknowledged that if she had known that witnesses at a Poway bar said Westerfield and Danielle's mother had been ``dirty dancing,'' it would have influenced her evaluation of the fiber evidence.

Shen also told prosecutors that the amount of orange fibers found in Westerfield's SUV, home and motorhome made it unlikely the fibers were transferred from a third party.

Jurors also have reviewed the pornographic evidence in the case and asked to look at photographs that Westerfield had taken of his ex-girlfriend's teen- age daughter. Prosecutors told the jury that one photo of the daughter lying by the pool was sexually suggestive.

Jurors also listened again to a taped interview the defendant gave to a police interrogation specialist on Feb. 4.

Nearly 100 witnesses were called during the two-month trial.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandamswingers; westerfieldrailroad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 381-391 next last
To: spectre
Wonder if CTV has a legal department. Bwahahahahahaha!
181 posted on 08/20/2002 11:18:03 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: shezza
"Wonder if CTV has a legal department."

LOL!! Actually, they do!
182 posted on 08/20/2002 11:20:27 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Looks like Court TV is taking some tap dancing lessons...ta-dah!

Beth Karas is looking abit frayed around the edges today. Poor baby.

sw

183 posted on 08/20/2002 11:29:32 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
KryptJackals are ascared to come over here, they just want to play in the sandbox where you can't say words like KIMMIE PORN.

Quick before it goes, --uh too late #646

184 posted on 08/20/2002 11:32:53 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
The brain dead websleuthers just lurk here...too afraid to post...been there done that.
185 posted on 08/20/2002 11:36:27 AM PDT by countess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: All
Wha' happened? The other thread got locked! I didn't think it was that bad.
186 posted on 08/20/2002 11:37:44 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Figures......
187 posted on 08/20/2002 11:38:35 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
I think some are getting really worried Westerfield will get off, and they'll look stupid.

I agree..the tone has changed significantly..

But I do still get upset with the Fox News talking heads that have NOT followed the trial (O'Reilly and Hanniety) declaring the jury dumb and Westie guilty.. I sent an email to O'Reilly and invited him to read the FR threads..

188 posted on 08/20/2002 11:38:39 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Elsewhere it was stated that the reason the jacket and carpet was not photographed correctly is because the spots look like Q-tips. The carpet being a perpendicular placement and the jacket being a drag/smear.

SO, in laymen's terms, the DNA evidence in the MH was OBVIOUSLY a PLANT, and PHOTO evidence was purposely shabby to conceal that FACT.

189 posted on 08/20/2002 11:38:45 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: shezza
It's back on...
190 posted on 08/20/2002 11:39:13 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Right you are. Just the goose-steppers doing a little housekeeping, I see. ;o)
191 posted on 08/20/2002 11:44:11 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
"Wonder if CTV has a legal department." LOL!! Actually, they do!

Hopefully, if DW gets acquitted, CTV legal dept. will have to earn it's paychecks.

192 posted on 08/20/2002 11:44:12 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; Krodg; countess; kayti
Carried over from the other thread. Maybe it won't get jerked....

Right. This is the internet and we can be anyone we want. So far on these threads we have the Chief of Police of Hobart Indiana, Mother Theresa in drag, The Keeper of the Gates of Morality. Shall I go on? How do any of us know who any of the rest of us are?

I have PERSONALLY dealt with Cletus/John. I have seen him attacked because he defends his friend. Would that all of us had friends like that. Even Kimmie knows that the remarks about Cletus annoy me.

To my knowledge, Cletus has never posted here. I have invited him on more than one occasion. But really what's the point? There are those who would question his credibility. There are those who would call him a pervert. There are those who would go out of their way to anagonize him. IMO, he doesn't need that kind of B/S. He could go to The Ned Forum for that, enough from this forum do.

/rant off
193 posted on 08/20/2002 11:45:52 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

Comment #194 Removed by Moderator

To: dread78645
Still got it in the other window:

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

Hey you're a great spell-checker .... OBSESSION!! Do believe you posted something about that the other day, correct? Kimmy porn can be offensive no matter where it comes from.

Second point, "just showing you he did".... that still doesn't make him Cletus! Just like it doesn't make you the Mayor of Fresno.

646 posted on 8/20/02 1:14 PM Central by kayti

--- and a follow-up ---

To: kayti

Oops... another error...
not "Kimmy porn", but "Kimmie, porn...."

649 posted on 8/20/02 1:15 PM Central by kayti

Both posts -Jackalated. Somebody need some of this for their thin-skin !

195 posted on 08/20/2002 11:46:22 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; nycgal
Earlier tonight, I again heard a defense attorney on FoxNews state that Danielle's hair was found between DW's comforter and flat sheet on his bed. Am I going nuts or what? I thought the only hairs found on sheets were those on sheets in the washer or dryer.

Fox is the worse..send them rheos list in a email will you? I have already written once to O'Reilly

Send it to Hannedity and O Reilly OK?

196 posted on 08/20/2002 11:49:32 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Jaded; basscleff
Nice Rant Jaded...I that it's admirable what you are doing. While we don't agree with everything about this case...it's probably a good thing you couldn't get him to post on fr prior to the gag order.

basscleff, thanks for the invite, but no thanks....
197 posted on 08/20/2002 11:51:13 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
No, Fatima, it's called dragging a holy name through the mud. If you're going to assume such a name, you should try to assume the attributes instead of pretending to be someone you're not and creating mischief. That's just plain sick. You're the one putting down Catholics by using that name in that way.

Actually Mohammad had a daughter named Fatima..I would be more worried about that that being seem in a smokey back room:>)

198 posted on 08/20/2002 11:52:20 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
Actually, these flames are milder than previous..none of us can argue with that...

Take care..cya on the bright side. :)
199 posted on 08/20/2002 11:54:24 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
You are kidding right. There is no way she would stay and take what she gets away with dishing out over there.
200 posted on 08/20/2002 11:54:34 AM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 381-391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson