Mudd Denies Access To Transcripts As Well As Lineage To Hussein: Van Dams' Sex Life Still In Play!

Union Tribune ^ | August 19, 2002 | San Diego Tribune

[clearvision]

2 minutes apart you could be switching names in that time. Try posting at the same time 1 minute from now....

[spectre]

Please, don't tell me the new rule of etiquette on FR is we can only post to someone who has posted to us? Is THIS next?

I'm a goner...for sure..sheeze!

sw

[UCANSEE2]

From the 'other thread'

To: kayti; All

Take it to the Smokey Backroom or face suspension.

682 posted on 8/20/02 11:37 AM Pacific by Admin Moderator [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

[Jrabbit]

Not Kim! She won't allow porn and since I don't think DW is guilty then it only stands to reason that I like and approve of porn.

[kayti]

I believe they were educated in the public school system, where self-esteem has higher priority than truth, honesty, and justice.

"Nice" means being able to spew forth lies while telling the other side to "prove it". It means mis-stating facts as if it were sworn testimony. It means cheating on your homework and hoping the other guy does it for you.

[UCANSEE2]

See, "pressure" does happen.

Does, will, and most likely, in this case, was the reason DW is facing TRIAL.

[UCANSEE2]

P.S. Thank you for providing some insightful, related information!

[Politicalmom]

You broccoli headed porn lover you!!! (Just kidding, HUGGZZZ)

[ican'tbelieveit]

There was a part in there about the chemicals attaching to the surface. But a sun bleach only fades out the color, where a chemical bleach will actually affect the exterior of what is being bleached.

[kayti]

Only in Kim's world!!

[kayti]

I'm here, I'm here!! (Now I sound like a confused Fres!)

[UCANSEE2]

This is like the Star Trek with the bearded, evil Spock. Over in the 'nice' Gen Interest thread, flamethrowers seem to be the debating tool of choice; meanwhile, here in the 'naughty' Backroom we're having a (somewhat) pleasant chat.

Yeah, kinda funny. I noticed that too.!

[kayti]

Kim seems to have a hang up with KIDDIE porn, as she puts it. But, from what I have read in her posts she doesn't understand the legal obligations of proof of KIDDIE porn. It is not just a person under the age of 18.

Wonder if she considers her OBSESSION post the other day porn? Hmmmm.

[Jrabbit]

Just had to get that DIGgler in didn't you? LOL

[alexandria]

I am sorry but, about that hair thing. What the hell is up with the picture of a hair against a white background being "compared" to another hair on a pinkish/orange background?

If I was a member of the jury I would JUST HAVE to get up and point out.
"Haven't ANY of you people EVER watched Sesame Street?" WELL?
Then sing it with me, "one of these things IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER!"

[MizSterious]

Really? What on earth would YOU be "figuring"? That you whined until some poor duped moderator finally locked the thread for you? Bwhahahahahaha!

[kayti]

What the hell is up with the picture of a hair against a white background being "compared" to another hair on a pinkish/orange background? Think they are hoping the jury doesn't notice the background and the slightly different size.

[spectre]

I thought that if things got too hot over there, the Admins were going to MOVE the entire thread over to Smokey Backroom.

It would be a cryin shame if that happened...GRINS..

sw

[ican'tbelieveit]

That reminds me of all of the "before and after" pics on some products.