Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: algore

They act like it wasn’t liberal democrats who came up with the original idea to make sure liberal judges are selected and approved and conservative judges are anally probed to find some reason to reject.

Robert Bork, anyone?


2 posted on 06/30/2026 9:09:34 PM PDT by John Milner (Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: John Milner

“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.” -commie JR

Totally unhinged from reality....


6 posted on 06/30/2026 9:30:24 PM PDT by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: John Milner; Paladin2
I’ll extend a big THANK YOU TO TED KENNEDY for possibly preventing a 4-5 loss in Heller, the ascent of the Collective Model, and the eviscerstion of the 2nd Amendment.

Oh, and possibly Dobbs/Roe's repeal, too.

Stick with me.

The Lifeguard of Chappaquiddick is largely responsible for the destruction of Robert Bork's SCOTUS candidacy. That slot was occupied by Justice Anthony Kennedy ultimately.

Justice Kennedy was a squish. But he DID side with the majority in Heller. That's big.

Ah, but what if Bork hadn't been Borked. Well...the truth is... Bork MAY have voted against Heller.

In Slouching Towards Gomorrah, Bork referred to the language of the Second Amendment as “somewhat ambiguous[].” In the same passage, he stated that “The Second Amendment was designed to allow states to defend themselves against a possibly tyrannical national government.”[4] While it is clear that Bork was opposed to gun control on policy grounds, it is not clear that he agreed that the Second Amendment conferred an individual right. In fact, Bork’s skepticism regarding the gun lobby’s advocacy of individual rights under the Second Amendment (shared by former Chief Justice Warren Burger) may have been the reason the National Rifle Association chose to remain neutral during Bork’s 1987 confirmation hearings. Moreover, Bork might have been reluctant to overrule (or distinguish into irrelevance) the arguably contrary precedent in United States v. Miller[5], which is what the majority in Heller did. It appears that Bork construed Miller the same way Justice Stevens’ dissent in Heller did: as ruling that the Second Amendment confers a collective, not an individual, right. The way he put it in Slouching Towards Gomorrah (12 years before Heller) was: “The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that there is no individual right to own a firearm.”

By blocking Bork and paving the way for Kennedy, Uncle Ted very possibly helped save the legality of the Individual Model.

It gets better.

Bork died in 2012 during Obama. That would have guaranteeing a leftist nut-job replacing Bork, tipping the scales to a 5-4 liberal SCOTUS majority until Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg died in 2020. That is a LOT of bad rulings.

It also means no 6-3 margin for Dobbs, Bruen, or EPA.

So Ted, you magnificent liberal, wherever you are, thank you for being a friend of the NRA and patriotic Americans.

24 posted on 07/01/2026 2:37:49 AM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson