Free Republic
Browse · Search 		Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: publiusF27
Even Scalia agreed. …
That is argumentum ad verecundiam.

I noticed that Thomas did not agree, and of late he has been the most Constitutional out of the current bunch.

Also, using Gonzales appears to engender an apples/oranges comparison. Cannabis is not mentioned in the Second Amendment.
20 posted on 03/05/2021 9:48:32 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

SCOTUS managed to see the relevance when they remanded US v Stewart to be decided “in light of” their decision in Raich. That’s just one chapter in the long book of gun grabbers using legal precedents established by drug warriors.


21 posted on 03/06/2021 3:55:44 AM PST by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search 		Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson