Posted on 08/06/2017 7:52:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
This week, famous millennial journaler Lena Dunham was strolling through an airport eavesdropping on a couple of flight attendants. There she was, just a right-thinking individual with fluency in approved language and a desire for a kind and compassionate society, when she heard a conversation that violated her sense of an ideal society.
Then, as any individual principally interested in kindness and empathy would do, she reported the flight attendants conversation to their bosses at American Airlines.
Then, filled once more with the compassion and humility that are her hallmarks, Dunham broadcast this conversation, and her reporting of it, to her millions of social media followers. American Airlines is reportedly looking into it.
Because how, pray tell, could the world be a good place if middle-class flight attendants are allowed to talk to their friends at work in any way that gives this rich, famous public emoter a sad? What have we become, as a country, if millionaire, private-school progeny of Brooklyn art-scene families cant have their exact conception of acceptable conversation reflected back to them during every minute of a flight delay?
Heres What Lena Dunham Had a Fit About This Time
Hearing this conversation, Dunham wrote, was the worst part of her night.
This is the conversation Dunham alleges she heard. They were talking about how trans kids are a trend theyd never accept a trans child and transness is gross.
Transness is gross sounds like a very Dunham-esque construction, so perhaps this is just her paraphrasing of the conversation, in which case Id like to have a better understanding of what these people actually said. It is unclear, and ABC News notes in its reporting, Dunhams Instagram Story appears to have shown the actress later on a Delta Air Lines flight, which operates out of a different terminal than American Airlines. It wouldnt be the first time hazy, unverifiable accusations from Dunham had messed with someones life before falling apart on examination.
Also unclear for now, thank goodness, are the identities of the attendants she targeted with her online crusade against oldspeak.
American Airlines released this statement in an attempt to appease this piece of walking performance art and her followers and assure all of us it does not condone thoughtcrime in its ranks and greatly appreciates the efforts of Citizen Dunham to root it out.
From the team members we hire to the customers we serve, inclusion and diversity is a way of life at American Airlines. Every day, our team members work to make American a place where people of all generations, races, ethnicities, genders, sexual orientations, religious affiliations and backgrounds feel welcome and valued.
Dunham, who claims she was animated by a desire for love and inclusivity, could have actually spoken to the flight attendants in question, but she did not. There are so many things that are creepy about this. The initial eavesdropping, the immediate appeal to authority, the desire to threaten livelihoods over snippets of conversation for which one has no context.
Then theres the ever-present Dunham show. Not only does she want to be a minder of her fellow citizens, she wants everyone to know shes a proud minder of her fellow citizens and she wants to recruit more minders. The message is clear: Someone is watching you and youll pay for being out of line.
Dont join her.
Nobody Likes the Thought Police
This is the sinister side of the liberal hamburger problem Josh Barro wrote about. His thesis is Democrats could win a lot more elections if they stop insufferably hectoring everyone about everything for instance, insisting eating a hamburger is an inherently political act because of the public health consequences and the carbon footprint and the blah, blah, blah. Hes probably right about that, but many liberals go far beyond hectoring (a subject I covered in depth in my book, End of Discussion, which is out in paperback this week, by the way!).
In the worst cases, they equate speech that offends them with violence and decide violence is therefore necessary and righteous to oppose it, as on Middleburys or Berkeleys campuses.
Dunham isnt content to publicly lecture about trans issues. She wants to punish people who disagree with her, going after their jobs without so much as a conversation with them, and she expects to be thanked and honored for her good works.
On the trans issue, in particular, the expectations of liberal activists are ridiculous. The concept is a fairly new one to many Americans, and one that upends a fundamental understanding of human life as made up of biological men and women that up until a couple years ago was the perfectly acceptable understanding of human life. The approved way of talking about this issue changes seemingly weekly, and one is supposed to arrive at the approved thoughts and words about a complex and confusing issue without ever uttering anything deemed transgressive or transphobic by the likes of Lena Dunham on the way there. This is an unreasonable standard.
And thats just if you agree with everything liberal activists want you to. God help you if you dont. Never mind that the target is so swiftly moving, I would not be at all surprised if you could find prose in Dunhams 2014 memoir, Not That Kind of Girl, that someone would call transphobic. That was eons ago in social-justice-warrior years.
As she is wont to do, Dunham reflected on this experience publicly.
For those who followed my airport saga yesterday, heres my takeaway: these days its the little things. A smile. Offering a seat. Respect, she wrote.
The little things, like having a conversation with a coworker on a break without a super-rich bully trying to get you fired.
Would she have reported it if she overheard them trying to hijack the plane?
I know the feelings of the airline workers as I was fired for old speak and alleged thought criminality.
I am not sure that is true. I've known some 'crazy' people and they are quite aware of their affliction.
I am not sure that is true. I've known some 'crazy' people and they are quite aware of their affliction.
Seinfeld as we knew it could never be made today.
Is this the one who bragged on molesting her little sister? And her little sister grew up to be a lesbian.
Yes.
Seinfeld himself recognizes this and won’t go near college campuses.
Probably not. As a former armed guard I don’t think people realize how expensive executive protection agents are. Even big celebrities only get them when they think there will be a possible need for them. Only hundred millionaires and billionaires regularly have full time bodyguards.
LD IS a Creep, in SO many dimensions.
She probably belongs in gaol for all of her crimes.
And not just those from the Fashion Police...
Shouldn’t she be wearing Man shoes?
Or would she have reported them, if they were bad mouthing Christians? Probably not, I would suspect. I think it is probably a totally made up story.
S/he got her nails done. Talk about spitting into the wind.
This mediocre person is given way to much attention.
Foundation garments. She can afford them and she needs them. Desperately.
She gets all the attention because she's the best they've got. She's their John McEnroe, she's their Hank Aaron.
If she’s still trying to get Odell Beckham Jr’s attention, this ain’t gonna work.
hillary and merkel all rolled up into one offputting fuzzball.
Here we ago again with this putrid vile pig who likes to talk about sexually molesting her baby sister.
She is a perverted freak and should be mocked, humiliated and insulted at every opportunity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.