This is not the only time the good judge's opinions were confused & disoriented.
A normally brilliant lawyer, in this case Napolitano here buys into the pro-Confederate Big Lie, namely that Lincoln started Civil War to prevent Southern secession.
That is not just a pro-Confederate Big Lie, it is an unspeakably outrageous lie, which takes no great historical expertise to puncture.
In actual historical fact:
What did start Civil War was the Confederate military assault on Union troops in Union Fort Sumter, soon followed by a formal declaration of war on the United States and military aid to pro-Confederates fighting in Union Missouri.
All that happened before a single Confederate soldier was killed directly in battle with any Union force, and before any Union army invaded a single Confederate state.
So, accusing Lincoln of starting Civil War is just like accusing President Roosevelt of attacking the Japanese at Pearl Harbor.
It is an unspeakably outrageous Big Lie.
In other words, he's brilliant when you agree with him but when you disagree with him then he's confused and disoriented. The level of revisionism to which you've sunk is mind boggling.
hat did start Civil War was the Confederate military assault on Union troops
The revisionist gymnastics that you False Causers have to go through to justify disHonest's Abe's illegal war is shameful. Have you ever actually read a detailed history or do you just go to the NEA's website for talking points?