[Charles H. (The_r0nin)]

But after reading the misleading reviews by other editors that shall remained unnamed, I just felt like I had to set the story straight. For one thing, all the features that one reviewer panned (he had put his Apple Watch on Craigslist because of them)...

So the guy who wrote this article is responding to multiple editors who wrote critical articles about the Apple Watch?

Why not put those articles up on FR too? I mean, if you are interested in discussing Apple products (and not simply shilling for Apple), wouldn't you want all of the opinions to be considered? Or are you only interested in the articles that praise Apple? Why is that?

[IncPen]

If the people interested in Apple products want to read this, what do you care?

Who appointed you as forum censor?

[Swordmaker]

So the guy who wrote this article is responding to multiple editors who wrote critical articles about the Apple Watch?

I have. They aren't that bad. . . just moderate. Frankly, there aren't that many negatives. They were usually positive with a few negatives sprinkled amongst them. Most of the negative press comes from people who don't use the Apple Watch so is an unqualified opinion and I don't post those because they mean nothing. Those are basically echo chambers of people saying I have no use for this product.

I post both positive and negative articles on Apple.

[Swordmaker]

So the guy who wrote this article is responding to multiple editors who wrote critical articles about the Apple Watch?

By the way, if you find one that I've missed, post it and let me know and I will ping the 700 members of the Apple ping list so they can discuss it if these TROLLS don't make a mess of the thread.

Incidentally, I post only about 40% of the Apple threads. Most are posted by other Freepers.

Thanks for your interest.