“In post #14, you wrote that porn addiction was a phrase concocted by feminists. That certainly implies you don’t think porn addiction exists”
I wrote that it was a phrase concocted by feminists because they tend to ignore basic, natural, male behavior and treat it as an anomaly or in some way abhorrent behavior.
I do not believe that you will find that I wrote that an “addiction” occurring in certain individuals does, or can not, exist. Can you?
You seem to find it difficult to differentiate between flippant remarks in an internet forum and protestations of conviction laid down for serious debate.
I called you a troll because you match the role: you ignore the comment in total then “counter” argue on a topic that is not only irrelevant to what I wrote, but also attempts to pervert what I wrote.
I didn’t attempt to pervert what you wrote. I simply misunderstood your intent. I didn’t realize it was a flippant comment. All you needed to do was explain what you really meant instead of getting all riled up (assuming you were indeed riled up, because I could again be mistaken). I certainly didn’t mean you any ill will.
BTW, I don’t actually disagree with your comment about feminists. I also agree I sometimes miss flippant remarks and misconstrue them to be serious debate. Text alone is a pretty poor means of communication. Again, you could have easily and politely defused it all by simply posting you were poking fun at feminists and agreed porn can be addictive.