The problem with Catholic Social Services is:
Why would an organization from Connecticut get involved with someone coming into the states at a Hawaii (air)port of entry?
Lutheran Social Services and Catholic Social Services were the only contractors with DHHS, Office of Refugee and Resettlement, for taking custody of minors with foreign nationality unaccompanied by an adult in 1971. State run child welfare agencies did not have the authority to take custody of minors with foreign nationality who have been abandoned at a border crossing in 1971.
http://www.lssne.org/About-LSS.aspx
CSS is national function of the Catholic Church. It has been in the refugee assistance role for a long time. I do not have specifics but below is an example of the service as it currently exist.
http://www.catholiccharitieshawaii.org/site/384/immigrant___refugee_services.aspx
http://www.ccs-soaz.org/Catholic-Social-Service-Migration-and-Refugee-Services.html
The basic question is -
Who was Obama’s legal guardian as of January 1972?
It was not Stanley Ann Dunham, Lolo Soetoro or Barack Obama. That is a fact beyond reproach.
So who was it? Only one explanation has ever come forward. If you remove it it needs to be replaced. As Einstein once said - “Nature abhors a vacuum”. And thus far, only one single explanation of the vacuum of guardianship has come forward. But before debunking the story hard facts that contradict the story MUST come forward. Until they do - Sven’s ‘call on the field’ is, at worst, still under review.
I find this long distance connection to a social security number issued in March of 1977 a stretch and understand the question. But assuming the number is valid and not from an act of brazen identity thief (that Ayers & company were very good at) then the story is about the only one that makes sense.