Sheriff Joe Now Investigating Obama Alias Harry Bounel: Obama Mama In WA In 1961 (Arpaio)

His thrashing around trying to put something up on the scoreboard smacks of desperation, IMO (gun grabbing? minimum wage increase?) and it is all small-ball so far.

He’ll do war in the Middle East against the Islamic power and military he built up.

How does one file federal income tax returns with an invalid Social Security number?
How do you “prevent discovery” when the Obama defense attorney doesn’t even show up for the trial and the judge complies with the plaintiffs’ request for a “trial on the merits” to proceed without a defense in Georgia’s Farrar, Swensson, Weldon and Powell v Obama?

The mythos of the Mother is so powerful in human culture (mother earth!) the very idea that the woman with whom he was first photographed with at the age of three isn’t his mother, is like a slap across the face with a dirty wet sock to most people. It’s so offensive that every theory, even though there is no actual proof she’s his mother, comes back to it full circle. His father was obviously a coloured man, so his father has to be either the kenyan student as according to ‘Dreams’ or the other, nearest black, the man who was 35 years older, and to achieve that idea, the girl had to be turned into a pornographic model (although it’s been clearly shown the photographs were first published in 1958) but then, she was down at the docks chasing black men wasn’t she? Straight out of high school and into bed with her appetite for negro men...although she hadn’t had a boyfriend in high school. The people who write this stuff about a girl they didn’t know show all the instincts of a vouyer, imagining a seventeen year old in a physical, intimate relationship with a man so much older, a man with an attractive wife and four of five children, reeks of a pornographic imagination.
So, you’re angry with the girl because she gave birth to a creature whose politics are a threat, are you?
Get off her back, I’ve got happy news for you...she wasn’t his mother. She was his Nanny. It looks like she dropped out of high school and went to live with her uncle, (she was accepted to attend the U of Chicago, according to ‘Dreams’ remember?) And Uncle Charles was the Deputy Director of the Library. Uncle Charles was still at the U of Chicago when zero was a law lecturer there...and his wife was on a committee with the wife of David Axelrod. They all lived in Hyde Park.
Who-ever wrote ‘Dreams’ attempted to illustrate her passion for blacks by telling you she first saw the film Black Orpheus when she was ‘only sixteen then’ and was working as an au paire in Chicago. That film was released in December 1959 iirc. (Check it out, I’m writing from memory.)
So while she was in Chicago, her ‘nude’ photographs supposedly taken by Frank, whom she had never met, appeared in exotic magazines that were published in New York. And she then marries a black native from Kenya, does she? I guess that was to cover up the fact that she was pregnant to Frank and that’s why they sent her to Kenya where she ended up taking a train from Kisimu to Nairobi and then to Mombasa with the Obama Clan and had a baby in Mombasa and/or tried to get on an aircraft to get back to the US but wasn’t allowed to board.
Something like that.
Poor Stanley Ann Dunham. Poor Stanley Armour, whose friendship with Frank has also been an assumption, a working tool without proof. Poor Madelyn, whose ashes were thrown off the cliff in Hawaii into the wind, rather than have her buried next to her husband...but not ‘poor Frank’ because he had lots more to answer for than we will ever find out, he was the man you went to for what it was you needed by the way of documentation, in his capacity as the head of the organization known as THE PROTECTION OF THE FOREIGN BORN - Frank could get you anything you wanted I guess, like announcements in papers and ID documents, and fake marriage licences.
He managed to keep some very well known communists from being deported from Hawaii, in his time at the helm. But no one wants to know any of this, it’s all too complicated. I realized it was going to be a hard slog when it became apparent that no one could add 18 months to July 1959 and reach the date JANUARY 1961 when Mary baby-sat for ANNA - and that was way before Stanley Ann could have had a baby, because that child was conceived before the girl finished high school (if she did, but it’s doubtful) or was not on Mercer Island any more, but in Chicago.
Her only trip to Seattle would have been to pick up little zero, whose parents you don’t know, and show him to Susan Blake, during which visit she told Susan about the kenyan student she had married. And Susan apparently bought it. Which was the way it was intended.

Is that William Ayres I can hear, laughing? By golly, I do think it is...and this is me, the Aussie, saying fare-thee well; learn to love your POTUS, he’s going to be with you for a looong time, fundamentally changing America.

FR won’t let me see your comment on the thread, but I read it on my ping page.

To me, truth is akin to God. Of course, all truths in this mortal realm are temppral, always sometwhat partial or relative; just becasue of individual limitations, the changes of time, the fact that no fallible individual can ever know “everything” and so on.

But still, objective reality aka truth exists. And lies and deceit exist. I’ve said this many times but your comment brings it up in my mind again. If a person thirsts for truth MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE - and has the humility to admit “maybe I don’t know” and is willing to kick out any beliefs, no matter how fondly held, if proven wrong, then that person will know as much truth as it is possible to (in this temporal realm). About that which they want to know the truth.

I also think that FR has been a magnet for some extremely serious malefactors, both professional and lone wolf. The revolutionaries need secrecy, they need the truth about 0bastard’s real history and life completely out of sight and hidden. Why else would Ayers have written “Dreams”? Why the forged documents? Why the hidden educational records? Why the passport breakin? Why the crimes committed at the HI DoH? Why the long list of lies, cover ups, a whole industry actually?

Obviously to cover up the truth. The myth that he is the son of SAD and the Kenyan, was born in HI on such and such a date, and the rest of it - pure fabrication. The whole story is a lie. If anyone is honest, they will say “I don’t know who he is, what his name is, who is mother and father are, where he was born, or when is his date of birth”. And start from there.

Anyone saying that his actual identity doesn’t matter is on the side of lies. It DOES matter. If it didn’t matter, the revolutionaries wouldn’t have made up an entire false identity.

The fact that your comments are ridiculed, vilified, attacked and condemned - and you also attacked personally - shows how dangerous the truth is, to the revolutionaries. Am I saying that everyone on FR who attacks you and your comments is part of the cabal? No, I am not. Some are just loners who are emotionally attached to their personal myths, some may be useful idiots. But I have no doubt whatsoever that some of them are part of the cabal that put him in the WH and want to keep him there.

Anyone who fights for and seeks truth is a hero. The truth is all that matters, nothing else is worth a tinker’s damn.

“The uninformed must improve their deficit, or die.” – Cheshire cat

I have used Thomas Jefferson, Gandhi, Winston Churchill and a variety of other really smart luminaries as spokespeople for enlightened conflict and curiosity and fighting ignorance.

And now I can add the Cheshire cat to the list (you may have missed him because I think he disappeared right as he said the smart thing).
In Wonderland if you sought wisdom the queen sought to take off your head. On the other hand wisdom was the only way to keep your head.

Whew.

Now there is some conflict to deal with.

Being uninformed is truly a type of death.

It may end up being the slow death of ignorance but it is death in the end. Because being uninformed means you get left behind (or someone who is moving decides to cut off your head … like the Queen in Wonderland).

I am not going to waste a lot of words on a topic I have written a lot about. Fighting ignorance. Feeding your curiosity. Continuously learning.

And even unlearning to learn (which is really what I believe the Cheshire cat is truly talking about) is an important path to living a full Life. We all have a knowledge deficit. Similar to your own household balance sheet if you go too far in debt it is very very difficult to get out of debt and a stable base. More importantly … if you don’t solve your intellectual deficit you just die in society. You will get passed by those who keep growing. Simply … knowledge is power. Knowledge has a value.

Bottom line.

Being uninformed is silly. And, frankly, being uninformed decreases your value … and value in Life.

With all available to us there is no excuse for remaining uninformed.

Oh. That is, of course, you seek to not live a high value Life.

I guess it just means you have decided to die intellectually. Or, as the Cheshire Cat does, disappear from Life.

.

http://brucemctague.com/tag/cheshire-cat-quote

And dental records are a compelling way to identify people...

So I'm showing you what your buddy Joel Gilbert has as 'dental records' - two photographs of two different girls showing that both have small canines, one totally different from the other...neither the girls nor their cotton-picken-frikken teeth have any resemblance to each other. Stanley Ann has an assymetrical, twisted little nose and a much longer face because of her grotesque chin.

And as I pointed out before, DENTAL RECORDS are useful to establish the identities of John or Jane Doe or the BODIES OF DECEASED PERSONS, according to the amount and type of work carried out to their teeth on their dental record, as held by their DENTIST. You're not just a fraud, you're a disgusting liar as well, and you can stop following me around or harking to your master seizethecrap when he whistles. Got that? Now bite me.

Sorry, but this is sheer ignorance. Dental records are used to find distinguishing characteristics, they can match bite marks, shapes of teeth, etc. The only “obot” here, Fred, is you.

good illustration. I used to believe.

Thought you might like to see some images of the man we are asked to believe is Lolo Soetoro, the first two images are scans of passport photographs and rather poor quality...they came from the FOI file...

The next one is the man on the couch in the happy little family in Indonesia group...

He seems to be the same man she's sitting next to on the left below with a Christmas tree in the background:

Yet, the younger man is also supposed to be Lolo, but the photograph appears to be someone else...that looks young enough to be the son of the man on the couch...she's wearing the same blouse but he has a different shirt, so it does seem to be a different person...it's quite an intimate pose with the younger man, but respectful with the elder...

And the first rather dark image which seems to show a man with a moustache, has more in common with the fellow holding Maya on the horse - btw, zero was a fat little fellow!

So my question is, just how many Indonesian men does it take to create one Lolo?

I would like nothing better than to see both the model and Stanley Ann bite you on the arm and compare the impressions of their teeth.

Thanks for demonstrating your Photoshop skills in creating a picture, but again, you end up damaging your case more than helping it. These women have the same eyes, the same width between their brows ... the images do NOT show different chins since the one on the left is actually covered. Why are trying so hard to deny the obvious??

There’s no doubt about you in my mind, your malice and lies are monumental, the image I posted came from the film your buddy Joel Gilbert circulated.

AND YOU KNOW IT. I DO NOT USE PHOTOSHOP.

What I wonder is why you are lying?

Have you always been this deceitful?

Yes, dental RECORDS.

Comparing a couple of photographs is not at all synonymous with “Dental Records”.

For you to accuse FN of being an obot is worse than repulsive.

A few links to help you understand that “dental records” means something completely different than “looking at a couple of photographs”.

http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/bdj/journal/v190/n7/full/4800972a.html

forensic dentistry:
A look at forensic dentistry – Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity

http://www.ada.org/3021.aspx?currentTab=1

Forensics in Dentistry

http://library.thinkquest.org/04oct/00206/pti_dental_matching.htm

Dental Matching

The uniqueness of a set of teeth is a powerful tool in confirming the identity of someone unknown, especially when a lack of DNA evidence is the case. You may be intrigued by the number of clues an examination of teeth can provide.

Right, the meticulously cropped and resized pictures and red circles around the teeth just spontaneously appeared.

thanks, playing with words doesn’t cut it, accusing me of photoshopping isn’t going to work, the two side by side images I posted earlier clearly show the photographs are of different women, regardless of how Joel Gilbert attempts to manipulate the images and circle the teeth which look nothing alike. Dental records are the records a dentist keeps on file that show the work a set of teeth have had done to them, that’s what allows the dental records to be used to assist in identification, impressions from bite-marks are not dental records, that’s an entirely different field of evidence, as you have clearly stated.
Our correspondent is fully aware of what he’s doing, he knows he’s muddying the water, throwing out accusations that have no foundation.
It’s simply politics.
That’s the plan B you and I have often discussed. Plan B is to create a meme that gives zero a US citizen father. For that, Stanley Ann and the model must have the same teeth, she has to be a little whore and slut, she has to be in an intimate relationship with an old black man thirty five years older, with a barrel chest, dumpy legs and a face only a mother could love, with a nose like a squashed dumpling.
She just couldn’t help herself...and her father didn’t mind.

PLAN B!

If the world was going to question his bona-fides with the kenyan student as a father, then Frank Marshall Davis is a huge improvement. It’s all in the TEETH, LOL!

THEY WERE CREATED BY JOEL GILBERT.

Not that it matters one iota who created the image with the circles, the images I posted of the side-by side photographs clearly show two different women.

Comparing a couple of photographs is not at all synonymous with “Dental Records”.

Nobody said it was "synonymous." Fred erroneously tried to assert that the matching teeth had no value, and I pointed out that dental records are used to identify people, which is true.

It does matter who created the image with the circles and how that image was created. And it is OBVIOUSLY the same person.

PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEETH OF TWO DIFFERENT WOMEN ARE NOT DENTAL RECORDS.