Posted on 08/11/2012 4:42:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
There seem to be theological errors in this church’s take, but as your son probably doesn’t grok Christian theology anyhow, it would be meaningless to say he sees errors in this particular Baptist church’s version of theology.
Evangelicals teach that hailing Mary is wrong, that it is something God never wanted, but this is not classified as an unforgivable sin.
Here’s what I’m saying. If conservatives logged onto a CINO site where a lyin’, librul statist was an acceptable candidate but they kept pushing their ultraconservative on the board, they wouldn’t be following conservative principles. But for the sake of argument, let’s say they do so, and then when the owner of the board comes out and says that regardless of the vp CINO choice, voting for an ultraconservative at the top of the ticket ain’t gonna happen. Would conservatives be whining and opusing? No.
Thanks for your honest answer to a sincere question.
I thought this was a Constitutional prerogative of the Senate, not a matter amenable to mere legislation. Someone’s going to sue, soon.
Oh well. I liked it at first glance. Glad I wasn’t pulling a lever. Sorry, Tamzee.
Glad you like it. And thank you for your other posts on the thread, I’ve been enjoying your comments :-)
Thank you, also, for sharing your story earlier. I read it shortly after you posted. God bless you and your family. Your life is a true miracle.
Congratulations. An answered prayer. I’ll pray more for you in the next weeks.
That mess up by Romney in the introduction by saying at first Ryan was going to be “The Next President of the United States” vs. VP I was thinking “if only that was the case...”
Peter Tork is not a Dork, Take it back!
That’s plain incorrect of Luke. Government under the constitution can’t require a religious test to qualify an elected candidate to take office. But!! A voter can use whatever criterion he or she jolly well pleases, whether it’s religion or whether the candidate prefers vanilla to chocolate ice cream.
Pardon me but I did not invent the figure of 0.0001% which you inflated to 3%. You have no idea what will be the outcome of this election. Why blame anyone other than the loser of the election (who you say will be Romney because I’m not voting for him) for not being persuasive enough to attract conservatives such as I am?
God is powerful enough to do whatever he wants. But the question remains unanswered IF he is doing so or if this is all ‘hopeful’ thinking on the ABOers part.
When one has to rationalize their vote for a liberal abortion/homo supporting liar by using God to do it, they should perhaps rethink their position.
You can take that as evidence of the count of atoms in the rings of Saturn if you wish. You have proved nothing.
What yanked my chain so much was his remark that he was a “Harvard trained lawyer”, yet spewed that nonsense.
It's sickly sad reading words from so many who call themselves conservatives, whose choices will knowingly and willfully cause the re-election of a lying, corrupt, Marxist to the White House. omg
“That’s why I’ve decided to vote for the Fourth or Fifth Party ticket. Either one of them should do better than that”
They’ll get less than 0.0001%. You might just as well vote for obama. But if it makes you feel better,,,,,, I’ve made my reasons clear as to why I will hold my nose and vote for Romney.
!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.