Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Meet the New Boss

But my point is there would have been no need for the forgers to forge in the name of the putative mother. It would have already been on a document. It was forged in recently, that’s been proven.


75 posted on 08/02/2012 10:31:01 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

If, under my theory, Stanley Ann was off who-knows-where having the baby and Grandma Toot filled everything in and submitted the form, then Grandma Toot may not have done a good job of mimicking Stanley Ann’s signature in that box and the forger later decided it was better to copy in an actual signature of Stanley Ann so that it would match her signatures on other documents in case anyone tried to compare the signatures.

Also, it is possible that Grandma Toot put a different name in that box - it calls for “signature of parent or other informant” and there is a little box to the right for checking whether it is the parent or just an informant. Perhaps in the original the box was checked for “informant” instead of parent and it was Grandma Toot signing as informant and Grandpa Stanley signing below that as attendant, or vice versa.


78 posted on 08/02/2012 12:11:23 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson