Replies

“In January 1964, Stanley Ann’s divorce petition alleged that they had a child BHO II. However, Obama Sr. never made answer to the divorce petition and he did not appear at the hearing in March 1964. It is notable that Stanley Ann did not seek child support against Obama Sr.; she may have known she was on shaky ground as to paternity and did not press the matter.”

However, in April or May he told the INS in Baltimore he was “separated” from his wife who was in the Philippines IIRC. This might be further evidence he was trying to intentionally distance himself from both Stanley and Barry and he may not have known about all of the notes in the INS files back in HI. He may not have known he was divorced, given all of the partying he was doing with Ruth on top of his studies. Ruth's parents were hysterical and calling Harvard and the INS trying to get him kicked out of the country.

Reading your comment about the divorce decree, I am wondering if the reason that child support was not adjudicated was that the BC requested for the divorce by Stanley Ann's attorney from Kenya never arrived in time, if the new revelation on the Daily Pen that there is one in the Kew, UK BNA (archive) is true indicated by an index of a male baby born to BHO Sr in 1961.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2908395/posts?q=1&;page=1#1

“It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that “birthers” had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama. This was done by Obama’s forgers to create “shell game” confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama’s forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand.

“Essentially, the Bomford affair was just another coverup to hide Obama’s foreign birth records.”

One of the most seductive things about that Bomford BC was that the date it was prepared of February 1964, IIRC, fit it being a document requested for the HI divorce court.

Now Daily Pen says that “an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB” for Obama was the template for the Bomford forgery “is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA.”

If Stanley Ann was hidden away in Kenya to deliver baby Barry, witnesses by Gramma Sarah as she claimed and registered in the colonial records not in the Kew, UK BNA, I think it is highly probable that BHO Sr. would know about that series of events. And he could be very motivated to hide it!

That Philippines reference is from an INS memo from April 1964: “After alien stated he was married, he said he was separated and that they may get a divorce. The wife in the Philippines from whom he is separated is a USC.”

The divorce decree was issued in March. Whether Obama Sr. had heard about this by April I don’t know. In the divorce, the court approved service of process of the petition on Obama Sr. by registered mail return receipt, and Obama Sr. did sign the receipt, which is in the divorce file. But he never filed an answer to the petition nor did he make any appearance in the proceeding.

I suspect what prompted Stanley Ann to file for divorce was her growing relationship with Lolo Soetoro, the Indonesian. I think it unlikely that Stanley Ann would have the divorce petition served on Obama Sr. out of the blue. There was probably a letter to him telling him to expect a divorce petition and telling him that she was dating a man from Indonesia.

Obama Sr. probably mis-remembered this as the Philippines when talking to the INS about her and he may have been under the impression she and her new man were going off to his home country.

Consider the August 1961 communications Obama Sr. had with the INS. He told them Stanley Ann was attending Washington State University that semester. But that’s not where she was attending, she was attending the University of Washington. Obama Sr. couldn’t even be troubled to remember what college she was going to, this woman who supposedly had just given birth to his baby.

I think when he gained his doubts about whether he was the real father of the baby, from that point forward he could not have cared less about what she or the baby were doing, at least until years later.

As to where she had the baby, I don’t know. The shenanigans surrounding the birth certificate do suggest to me the cover-up has something to do with place of birth.

Did she go alone and pregnant to see his parents in Kenya (unaware of his wife and children there) in order to enlist them on her side? I don’t know.

Did she go back pregnant to the Seattle area or some other place in humiliation, and was cared for by relatives, perhaps relying on the generosity of Canada to cover the expenses of childbirth? I don’t know.

The Bomford document is clearly a forgery, and personally I doubt that any information on it was derived from viewing a real Kenyan birth certificate for BHO II.