Thanks for the link. I’ll have a look when time permits. So not to be dense, but if Polland is Polarik, why the two names? Is there not something a little sneaky about going by two different names...or did he have a good reason for the alter ego?
“If La Loggia thinks that she has the right to demand and desist that my article be pulled or edited from your site, then I also have the right to demand and desist that Ms. La Loggia remove the slanderous comments and patently false statements that she made of me on her website, and which still appear where I originally found them.
She still does not get it that Ron Polarik is a real name, NOT a screen name, whereas her name is nowhere to be found on her website, on her comments listed here, or ON THE REGISTAR DATABASE.”
For those who missed it:
“She still does not get it that Ron Polarik is a real name, NOT a screen name”
Looks like it’s his real name. Or so he says:
But he wasn’t finished disposing of the fake ‘pseudonym’ issue just yet. In case some might still be confused into thinking ‘Polarik’ wasn’t his real name, he clarified the issue right here on FR:
“Walden claims that, in a video, I said that my last name was a pseudonym. Unless he thought I said “pseudonym” onstead of “last name,” Fibber Walden here needs to wake up from nappy time and learn to look, listen, and for take notes - lots of notes because you can’t handle the truth — or recognize it if it ever bit you. I never said that Polarik was a pseudonym. My critics and detractors did, and you can join the club.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2232051/posts?page=41#41
One more:
‘””Anonymous pseudonym” is an oxymoron, and given that my name, Dr. Ron Polarik, is known around the world, I am hardly “anonymous.” Krawetz uses the term, pseudonym, as a pejorative to imply that I am a “fraud.” The truth is that “Dr. Ron Polarik” is the first person to blow the whistle on Obama and Factcheck”’
He says ‘Dr. Ron Polarik’ is his “name”. Not his screenname, not his pseudonym—his *name*. Okay; I take him at his word. It’s his name.
http://bogusbirthcertificate.blogspot.com/2008/12/bad-stridence-proof-positive-that.html
[Just for the record, I have never claimed that ‘Fantasywriter’ is my real name/not a pseudonym. Otoh, my “critics and detractors’ have indeed identified it as a pseudonym. Perhaps they didn’t realize, at the time, that while I’ve always identified it as a screenname, Polarik by contrast did indeed claim that ‘Polarik’ was his real name. A not so subtle difference, bound to be missed by those with a long history of missing the obvious.]
“Is there not something a little sneaky about going by two different names...or did he have a good reason for the alter ego?”
Well, most of us use an anonymous name on the web, don’t we...and for good reason!