“If La Loggia thinks that she has the right to demand and desist that my article be pulled or edited from your site, then I also have the right to demand and desist that Ms. La Loggia remove the slanderous comments and patently false statements that she made of me on her website, and which still appear where I originally found them.
She still does not get it that Ron Polarik is a real name, NOT a screen name, whereas her name is nowhere to be found on her website, on her comments listed here, or ON THE REGISTAR DATABASE.”
For those who missed it:
“She still does not get it that Ron Polarik is a real name, NOT a screen name”
Looks like it’s his real name. Or so he says:
But he wasn’t finished disposing of the fake ‘pseudonym’ issue just yet. In case some might still be confused into thinking ‘Polarik’ wasn’t his real name, he clarified the issue right here on FR:
“Walden claims that, in a video, I said that my last name was a pseudonym. Unless he thought I said “pseudonym” onstead of “last name,” Fibber Walden here needs to wake up from nappy time and learn to look, listen, and for take notes - lots of notes because you can’t handle the truth — or recognize it if it ever bit you. I never said that Polarik was a pseudonym. My critics and detractors did, and you can join the club.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2232051/posts?page=41#41
One more:
‘””Anonymous pseudonym” is an oxymoron, and given that my name, Dr. Ron Polarik, is known around the world, I am hardly “anonymous.” Krawetz uses the term, pseudonym, as a pejorative to imply that I am a “fraud.” The truth is that “Dr. Ron Polarik” is the first person to blow the whistle on Obama and Factcheck”’
He says ‘Dr. Ron Polarik’ is his “name”. Not his screenname, not his pseudonym—his *name*. Okay; I take him at his word. It’s his name.
http://bogusbirthcertificate.blogspot.com/2008/12/bad-stridence-proof-positive-that.html
[Just for the record, I have never claimed that ‘Fantasywriter’ is my real name/not a pseudonym. Otoh, my “critics and detractors’ have indeed identified it as a pseudonym. Perhaps they didn’t realize, at the time, that while I’ve always identified it as a screenname, Polarik by contrast did indeed claim that ‘Polarik’ was his real name. A not so subtle difference, bound to be missed by those with a long history of missing the obvious.]
One more thing. I saw where, right here on FR, Polarik said he had it on good authority that Obama never attended Punahou. Is this something else Mal-Valers believe? Of did Polarik get taken to task for saying something so stupid? If he did, maybe someone could give me a link. That is a take down I’d enjoy reading.
IIRC, Polarik was some kind of name that the Polland family used back in Poland or something like that, which was changed at Ellis Island or some such according to Polland. So Polland says, somewhat disingenuously, that he could claim that Polarik was a “real name.”
BTW, I chose not to ping Polarik or other FReepers who have posted intentional lies or abuse and, sadly, Polarik falls into that category, whatever the value of his research into reverse-engineering the SFBC. This is the same reason that I do not reply to FN or BD.
Polarik made false claims about the origin of a certain baby footprint image on a certain BC on a thread that got pulled (and on which I was zotted).