To: BroJoeK
Late in the war, there was burning and looting on both sides -- Chambersburg, Pennsylvania comes to mind -- but it's hugely important to remember that compared to most any war you can think of, the US Civil War was fought mainly by gentlemen who did not deliberately assault civilians.We both know the entire "March to the Sea" and the South Carolina campaign were slash and burn operations. You lose credibility when you make statements like that. Ridiculous.
74 posted on
04/10/2012 11:00:57 AM PDT by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va; BroJoeK
You said, "As far as I know the raping was at a minimal by Yankee bushwackers, unless you include the livestock." and yet are concerned with someone's credibility? LMAO
75 posted on
04/10/2012 11:45:55 AM PDT by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: central_va; rockrr
central_va:
"We both know the entire "March to the Sea" and the South Carolina campaign were slash and burn operations." Yes, as I said, burning and looting on both sides.
Confirmed reports of assaults on civilians: very few.
Indeed no doubt, a careful study would show more assaults on Southern Union loyalists by Confederates than Union Army assaults on Confederate civilians.
76 posted on
04/10/2012 3:13:11 PM PDT by
BroJoeK
(a little historical perspective....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson