Posted on 12/26/2011 9:49:19 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
I doubt the author of this piece has any right wing relatives.
Does the New Black Panther Party have white interns like Undercover Brother?
Terrified of the black panthers. lol. the black panthers are a bunch of city boys that wouldnt last ten min. out in the country.
Terrified of the black panthers. lol. the black panthers are a bunch of city boys that wouldnt last ten min. out in the country.
There can be no greater embarrassment then simply identifying one’s self as a liberal.
the author.
The last item, however, reveals how childish the author really is. A "spirited" argument on voter intimidation is the very last place a liberal wants to go in debate. I wouldn't mind it, though.
DINGDINGDING!
This is the natural result when one uses John Stewart as a primary news source.
I’ve been through Chemo twice in the last six years.
I tell anyone who cares that I LOVE BIG PHARMA.
For those who spend their time attacking Evil Corporations, you only have to ask them one simple question. Which entity can you CHOOSE not to deal with, a Corporation or the United States Government?
When they argue the point, tell them to stop buying Gasoline or stop paying Taxes so they see who comes to their door to rectify the situation.
Works for me but apparently no one in Law Enforcement. Or with Liberals. Or morons...but I repeat myself.
Oh. Yep, that does explain it.
I say the story or the arguments presented are bogus; iow, not real and nobody on the left made those asinine responses to the arguments/issues presented.
In other words, someone planted that story in order to make the liberals seem more dumb an ignorant and insane than they really are.
Nobody can be that stupid, not even the liberals, and the way the arguments were presented, well, it sounds like they were written by a kid in the third grade who heard about those issues for the first time in his life. It seems too dumb to be real.
I may disagree with liberals on most issues, but, I doubt that any of them with any knowledge on the issues at all, would construct something so dumb as the article above.
So, which republican operative/activist wrote up that nonsense and then sent it to Salon, in order to make them sound much dumber then they usually are?
——There can be no greater embarrassment then simply identifying ones self as a liberal.——
Funny.....Liberals say the same thing about conservatives
....not because they have the facts on their side just a sense of misplaced moral superiority
Sowell, in “Intellectuals”, nails this “tactic” to a T.
It’s “arguments instead of arguments”.
Leftists never argue based on the merits of the issue, but they always go for the “shut you down”, attempt to embarrass you into not arguing with them anymore.
After reading “you can still trust the communists to be communists”, I recognize this is a typical tactic of the left.
How lame is the person going to Salon for advice on how to conduct an argument?
Must suck to be them.
"If you have a smart phone, just bookmark Snopes now.
Why stop there? Surely there are more websites loyal to the Soros/Obama path of destruction. Am surprised the Obamanista who wrote this stupid article didn't try to shill Factcheck, Moveon or the other leftist propaganda sites.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.