You write: So, she was not legally drunk at the time she was detained by the officer.
The argument was never about whether she was legally drunk sir. The debate was about could she be at zero an hour after having a glass of wine. I say yes and a link to a women’s alcohol abuse site posted earlier supports that. Remember, a single small glass of wine may have just .25 ounce of alchohol in it.
The tacit assumption behind your claiming that she was "stalling" would be what, then, if not that she was legally drunk at the time?
You're really not very good at this, you know.
In that remark you are correct. The argument is about the way this woman was treated, the bogus reason she was pulled over, the failure of the officer to prove that she failed a field sobriety test, and the fact that there was absolutely no alcohol recorded on the tests given at the police station...........AND, the planned pullover of her husband by officer Smith..........