Posted on 06/07/2011 6:45:09 PM PDT by conservativegramma
Typeface analysis shows images come from different machines
The online image of a Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" was trumpeted by the White House when it was released on April 27 as "proof positive" that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
Now an expert in typefaces and typography says it sure was "proof," but not of what the White House would have wanted.
Paul Irey, a retired professional typographer with 50 years experience in his business, has says an analysis of the typefaces used in the Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate that the White House released on April 27 reveals it absolutely to be a forgery.
"My analysis proves beyond a doubt that it would be impossible for the different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have been typed by one typewriter," Irey told WND.
"Typewriters in 1961 could not change the size and shape of a letter on the fly like that," he said. "This document is definitely a forgery."
Irey acknowledges that an IBM Selectric typewriter could have produced different typefaces in a given document, but only if the Selectric ball was changed every time a different typeface letter was struck which would be unlikely to have been done to produce the word "Student," for example, that had two different styles of the lower case "t."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
2. True, but a few sleepers could surface, you never know.
So now you're slinging guilt by association as well? What a sorry POS. Either apologize for falsely characterizing me as you have or prove it with posts of mine. Or get lost.
There is something about you that seems so sad. If I can do anything to cheer you up just ask. ;^)
What's in the name, FRiend?
If I can do anything to cheer you up just ask. ;^)
Are ya sure about this carte blanche? Watch what you wish for!
You know perfectly well what my point is. Your not fooling anyone dude. Birthers have been calling almost anyone who disagrees with them, even folks that have genuinely tried to have a rational detailed discussion, obots, paid agents, liberal plants, etc, etc, etc. As a group, birthers have largely been downright nasty, disrespectful and mean. You know it and I know it, and your transparent attempt to feign outrage is not clever, it's laughable.
Oh and now in addition to accusing me of being a "hard core liberal who has no respect for the rule of law" you've called me a POS which I presume to mean piece of s**t. While I don't necessarily expect it, I still await your apology. Come on man, do the right thing - you'll feel better.
But I haven't. Not to you and not to anyone else. So there is the guilt by association strategy again and you can shove that.
Now don't assume there aren't limits! I'm not a Congressman and I'm not a Twitter user. lol
What you do you mean you haven't? The reason we are having this discussion in the first place is because you said I was a "hard core liberal who has no respect for the rule of law". That is precisely what led to this debate about the poor birther behavior. All you had to do was admit your misread my posts and offer at least a figleaf apology and we'd have long moved on. Instead you resorted to calling me a POS and now telling me to shove it. Your responses just stand as examples to the kind of obnoxious discourse I've pointed out has been common place from birthers.
The only thing that brought that about was your comment on Clarence Thomas.
That is precisely what led to this debate about the poor birther behavior.
There is no debate there is just you bloviating about it.
Yup, which you clearly either misread or intentionally misrepresented. Based on some of your behavior, I am guessing the later.
There is no debate there is just you bloviating about it.
Good, I'm glad you concede the point. Now if birthers dial back the venom with which they so routinely direct at those who don't agree with them, perhaps more courteous and reasonable discourse will take hold.
As well as puerile and repeating the same disproven nonsense ad nauseum and resorting to every dirty debate “tactic” in the book.
I told you what you could do with that guilt by association bull.
Isn't generalization fun? Anti-birthers are all gay too.
That green "Dunham" doesn't look much like the rest of them.
That's because it isn't like the rest of them and clearly indicates to me it was pieced together, altered or repaired, and I don't believe a one pass scan would produce that effect in a nanosec. Zoom up your copy; you'll see it right away. The Stanley in parentheses, the Ann D are anti-aliased. The rest of the signature is not, is jagged and not blended into the background. That's why it looks different because it is different. There are other examples of same in the document. Others have picked up on it, but I noticed that myself early on because I have used Photoshop to produce the effect or take it out. I could patch up that one in the cert # to look more like the other numbers. It's anti-aliased, too, and the rest of those numbers are not.
I said I can't get at the layer groups underneath, but on one of the early Youtube videos, I believe it had the anti-aliased portions of her signature I described on a separate layer from the rest of the signature.
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2011/04/evolution-of-stanley-ann-dunhams.html
There’s the link for the site I picked up the compilation of signatures.
The ‘green Dunham’ is of course...the signature on the most recent ‘birth certificate’...
And there’s no ANNA because ANNA OBAMA who lived in Seattle was probably the wife in the Philippines from whom the kenyan was separated, who had the baby that Mary baby-sat in January 1961, when her own daughter, who was born in July, 1959, was 18 months of age...
That little boy was more than likely born in Hawaii, that’s why the name is on the Hawaii birth index, but the mother’s name is ANNA (maiden name unknown)because it cannot be Stanley Ann Dunham, for when that child was conceived, Stanley Ann Dunham would still have been in high school somewhere.
The original, the one and only Barack Hussein Obama 11 was the child of ANNA AND BARACK OBAMA. Anna went back to the Philippines, zero, who showed up in Hawaii at the age of three...name and parents unknown...was given the name of the child of Anna and the kenyan.
AND WE STILL DON’T KNOW WHO HE IS. NOW THROW BRICKS AT ME!
Never mind, I found it at wnd. Oops, here's your "Anna", and she was using Obama. I could have edited out of my post the Ann but won't.
BTW, I don't believe I've ever gotten caustic with anti-birthers nor have they gotten so with me and don't know where I am. That's in reference to the ongoing bickering by others.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2702976/posts?page=448#448
some background for everyone - with images.
I remember vividly that Dan Blather was outed immediately by a GREAT FReeper, hmmm!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.