Posted on 04/11/2011 10:15:44 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Is there an echo in here....here....here...
Great Comment!!
A person does not run for president to take over, corrupt or destroy a nation.
Has he never opened a history book?
There have always been men that sought personal power via the ballot box; who were interested in attaining public office so they could use it for personal power. Rome, for example, was founded as a democracy, and ended up a dictatorship. That was over 2,000 years ago.
Obama & his Puppeteers are determined to destroy “Capitalism” & diminish our status in the World to make room for “One World Government” with that “Vile” George Soros at the controls!
What is wrong with people who can not see this??
I thought the phrase he used “by birthright or adoption” was a little strange. And I made an observation based purely on supposition. So I got to thinking maybe he meant by someone adopting this country. So, I googled birthright or adoption. And, Guess what you get. Adoption agencies and services.
I've never heard that phrase before concerning immigration. Maybe it's been used, I don't know.
Treason! If proven to be true is punishable by death in this country, but only in a time of war. I guess the USSC might have to decide if treason is punishable by death in a time of "kinetic military action". Either way, if in fact Obama is not eligible to be President, then every liar that helped him would also be guilty of treason and subject to death in a time of war.
This could also explain why Obama is so careful not to use the word war.
Why does it have to be one way or the other? Politicians run for office because they've chosen a particular program and want to put it into effect, or because they just like having power and position.
It's extremely unlikely that somebody gets elected because he or she wants to ruin the country. Most likely, people who think that a politician deliberately and consciously wants to destroy a country can't separate their own belief that the politicians ideas are destructive from the notion that the politician has to be some sort of melodrama villain who wants to do evil. There's something a little childish about that inability to see things in perspective.
But that doesn't mean we have to take politicians as men and women of good will who desire what's best for us. Rather, if they aren't just in it for power and position, they've adopted an ideology that gives them answers and moves them to take certain actions. They are what they are and they will be judged by the consequences of their actions. We don't have to see them as well-meaning saints or consciously evil-doing demons.
IDIOT!
Reminds me of a sign I saw at a Tea Party Rally...Waterboard Obama see if knows anything
I will try to remember that date when I need to impress someone with my knowledge of that vile cult.
And as for Andrew----lol----weird!
There's obviously something on it that would be catastrophic to his carefully-constructed image as "First African-American President".
What is it?
So Arnie could be President after all
How fitting that the SSN he uses belongs to a guy born in FRANCE!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.