Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: PugetSoundSoldier; antiRepublicrat; RachelFaith
BS, and you know it. I've not made profit margin comparisons across industries, and here you are implying I did. LIAR!

The only liar here, is you. You've done it across markets and industries. Repeatedly.

Who in their right mind would consider Apple, Microsoft, and Google NOT in the same industry? They're ALL tech companies, part of the IT sector! Are you going to now reassign markets to those companies, too? You're lying again by trying to imply they are in different markets.

Only every expert economist and educated financial analyst in the world. You want to make technical definitions sloppy so you can make a point and win an argument with me. It just doesn't happen that way. Apple does have divisions that at first glance potentially or actually DO compete with both Microsoft and Google in some markets, but overall, it does not.

The above list is by no means exhaustive, it is merely meant to be exemplar, so my omission of a product or market SHOULD NOT BE MISINTERPRETED BY YOU, as you are wont to do, as a lie. Each of these companies participate in several industries and multiple markets. Comparing aggregate profit margins is an exercise in futility to attempt to learn anything useful about a company's valuation without knowing the product mix and the economic mix of inputs. Comparing such aggregates of differing companies with totally different economic mixes, is USELESS noise, garbage information. It has no purpose other than your useless yanking point. It is only useful if you can compare companies efficiencies doing the EXACT SAME THING, in THE EXACT SAME MARKET to learn which is doing the better job.

Because of the OTHER factors I've constantly mentioned! Like total revenue, total profits, market share. You conveniently ignore those, and thereby lie about my position ONCE AGAIN.

No, you've been repeatedly focusing on the profit margin. Challenging me, no baiting me, and, as you said ignoring my explanation of those very other factors that are far more important in valuing a company. . . So you can once again LIE about my position because, as you admitted, you SKIPPED OVER WHAT I WROTE. No, again, you are back-pedalling to try and make it seem you were right all along. You cheat. You are a sloppy debater, and an obvious liar. I am done with you. You are completely dishonest in everything you post.

291 posted on 09/19/2010 4:06:16 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker; PugetSoundSoldier; antiRepublicrat; RachelFaith

Please clarify something; first Apple is going to be the ‘most valuable company in the the world’. Then its ‘the most valuable tech company in the world’.

Next its stop comparing Apple to Google and Microsoft as they don’t compete in the same markets. Apple is a hardware company and all that.

Now suddenly Apple competes with Google and Microsoft.

Can you please keep your stories straight?


296 posted on 09/20/2010 6:06:39 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson