“With the “Rathergate” case, things moved swiftly to a tipping point where the majority were convinced there had been a forgery. In the case of the Obama COLB, two years of “analysis” have not convinced anyone but some true believers that there is concrete evidence of a forgery.”
*******
This may simply be a case of the media wising up. They reported the Rathergate incident, although they didn’t want to. They don’t want to report this one, either, so they studiously ignored it from the get go. Rathergate did arise quickly, so they didn’t have much time to “spin” their responses. They were ready this time, with their Alinsky tactics of never investigating, never debating—in fact, never even acknowledging—reasonable questions or logical points, but instead attacking the messenger. You know, by calling them names like “birthers” and “tea-baggers”, even frauds.
They learned from Rathergate that’s for sure.
What I would like to know is this:
Why bring up the COLB issue again here? Why this thread?
What I know is this: The COLB is ultimately unimportant. Why? Because it is what is BEHIND the colb that is the main issue. If people are talking about the COLB, they aren’t talking about what it is CONCEALING. What the COLB is concealing is what is important.
I know it is concealing two things for certain:
1) It is concealing his full birth records. Hawaii doesn’t even recognize its OWN COLB as sufficient identification to be used in verifying “Native Hawaiian Status”. You have to have a long form for that. Thousands of babies got Hawaiian documents who were born “at home” and don’t have ANY long form information, yet got Hawaiian papers and thereby got US Citizenship. Now that is either Fraud on a large scale - an attempt to apply for and get more welfare dollars for the state for poor kids from the federal Government on the part of the State of Hawaii, something they would want to keep under TIGHT wraps for obvious reasons. As I said, its either fraud on a huge scale, or it was an innocent loophole that the state just never discovered... Uh hua. right. I have no proof of that, but sometimes a brown cow is a brown cow, even when someone swears its a WHITE cow. Hawaii would NOT want to have to admit that there are literally thousands of “Hawaiian” COLB bearers who got US citizenship who were born overseas to parents who WERE NOT CITIZENS of the United States. The state likely would want to keep that as far out of the public sight as it could possibly be. Golly, you don’t think Obama used that fact against Hawaii as LEVERAGE do you? Nah, no hard-ball Chicago Politician coming out of the machine politics of Chicago would do that.... (rolls eyes)
2) People are discussing the COLB instead of the fact he was born a subject of the Nation of Great Britain. For this reason alone, barring everything else, he could never have been a Natural Born Citizen no matter WHERE he was born. Kenya, Great Britain, in the lap of Lincoln’s statue in Washington DC. Shoot he could have been born in Lincoln’s bed in the White House and it would not have mattered. He was Born British. If he happened to be born in Hawaii, which on the face of it is looking more than a little doubtful at this point, that would be his ONLY legitimate claim to US citizenship at all. Not Natural Born Citizen Status, because he can never be a Natural Born Citizen. BUT... if he was born in Hawaii, then he is at least a citizen. Stanley Ann could not have passed her citizenship onto him if he were born anywhere else, BY LAW, because of her age at the time.
Now we have Stanley Ann’s passport information, which conveniently is missing the Original Application. Why would an under 20 girl need a passport unless she were going to be traveling outside the United States? Was it on a 3 yr renewal? Was it on a 5 year Renewal? We know because of the fact the first document is a renewal that she had a passport in the time frame her son was born. Why would she need one? Certainly not to go to Hawaii. She would not have needed one to go to Canada either. You could cross the border in those days with out a passport. Easily.
Now, lets ask ourselves, who benefits on keeping the spotlight on the COLB and whether the FactCheck Document is a forgery?
Who benefits from keeping the information behind the COLB sealed and secret.
Who is Polarik connected to? Phil Berg. Who is Berg? A democrat supporter of Hillary Clinton. When did Polarik join FR? June 22, 2008. Golly, isn’t that the time frame that the COLB became front and center. Did he join specifically to push that issue?
This is his first post at FR:
+++++++++++++++++
“To: RushingWater
Take a look at my blog post that started people questioning the validity of that image: Click here. If you read my original post, and then the last one I’ve posted today, you might just change your mind.
72 posted on 06/22/2008 5:51:14 PM PDT by Polarik (The Greater Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies | Report Abuse]”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2034830/posts?page=72#72
++++++++++++++++++++
Polarik joined FR the same day he made that post, he joined to push this issue. He pimped his own posts on Townhall, which was the subject of his second post.
+++++++++++++++
“To: mamelukesabre
If you read the additional analyses I made today (polarik.townhall.com), the only conclusion that can be reached is that the images posted on the “Daily Kos” and “Fight the Smears” are altered images, and not, in any way, true reproductions of a genuine document.
Assuming, of course, that Patricia Decosta’s image is a true reproduction, which it is, given the compelling evidence that validates it, such as embossed seals, signatures, true fold marks, etc.
If you or anyone can find more plausible reasons for all of the differences found between Obama’s image and Decosta’s image, I’d like to hear them.
However, I sincerely doubt I will, for not only are the images on these websites manufactured, they even differ from each other (check the corners of the borders).
The fact that there are so many others who have also found these differences tend to reinforce the conclusion.
Which is, to repeat, that these images are manufactured.
All we need now is to hear an admission of same.
82 posted on Sunday, June 22, 2008 8:40:10 PM by Polarik (The Greater Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies | Report Abuse]”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2034830/posts?page=82#82
I believe this link will lead to the very first posts made by Polarik: http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:polarik/index?more=55490905
Here is a link to the TownHall posts he was blog pimping:
http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/default.aspx
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Polarik has from day 1 been pushing the issue of the COLB. How its a fraud. Ok, he may well be 100% correct that it is a fraud. Honestly, the fraud started long before Obama ran for POTUS, the Il. Senate, or even went to college. It started at the time he was born. The COLB beiung fake keeps a fake COLB in the spotlight, which in the year plus its been known, has done nothing to prevent an usurper from taking office.
BUT... it has conveniently become a source of ridicule (IE Birthers) which discredits the issue in the minds of the public at large and the press. Polarik has been part of keeping the COLB in the spotlight. Ultimately the COLB is NOT the main issue. The main issue has always been what the COLB hides by creating an atmosphere ripe for ridicule. It hides British Citizenship, and possible welfare fraud and Identification fraud on the part of the State of Hawaii.
Now, in light of this... Polarik’s motivations MUST be called into questions. I made a mistake and admitted to it. So its not about me. I took my lumps for it.
WHY make the COLB an issue again, when it isn’t the MAIN issue? Why make me a target again? Why stir up any of this again?
Inquiring minds want to know.