Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
Funny, the suits keep on getting dismissed for LACK OF STANDING: meaning the evidence isn't even being considered.

Personal note: you might want to consider leaving the US if TSHTF. You don't sound like you're equipped to do much more than troll from your mother's basement.

Cheers!

73 posted on 07/21/2010 8:47:24 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

Funny, the suits keep on getting dismissed for LACK OF STANDING: meaning the evidence isn’t even being considered.
Personal note: you might want to consider leaving the US if TSHTF. You don’t sound like you’re equipped to do much more than troll from your mother’s basement.

Cheers!


And cheers to you as well. Thanks for the suggestion but my mother’s basement is in New York and I’m in California, so I’ll pass!

You are correct. Plaintiffs in Obama eligibility lawsuits have not been able to overcome the legal hurdle of standing and lawsuit after lawsuit (more than 50 of them) has been dimissed for lack of standing to sue. The one person in America with the best chance of being granted legal standing to sue is John Sidney McCain because he can show direct “injury-in-fact” from Obama’s election as the only other person to receive Electoral College votes. But Senator McCain has not filed suit. Even the Republican National Committee MIGHT have found a judge or a court that would grant the Republican Party standing to sue on behalf of the McCain-Palin campaign but that didn’t happen either.
That’s why I have favored a criminal justice approach to resolving the Obama eligibility issue. There are no issues of standing to get in the way of a Grand Jury investigation of Obama for forgery or election fraud and with a Grand Jury investigation (be it on the local level, the state level or the federal level) documents can be subpoenaed without Obama’s permission and witnesses can be compelled to testify under oath. But alas, no prosecuting attorney has had the guts to convene a Grand Jury investigation and “no guts, no glory.”

You have a wonderful day!


76 posted on 07/22/2010 10:01:12 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson