Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
That's not Apuzzo's "refutation." It is his argument. An argument (in case you have not noticed) that has yet to score him a single victory in any court.

Heck... anybody can lose a court case. Even me and you.
952 posted on 02/25/2010 2:20:32 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies ]


To: EnderWiggins
“That's not Apuzzo’s ‘refutation.’ It is his argument. An argument (in case you have not noticed) that has yet to score him a single victory in any court.”

Apuzzo refutes your contention that a self-authenticating documents is unassailable. Self-authentication is a presumption that can be rebutted, if I understand the FRE correctly.

Your lawyerly assertion that Apuzzo’s argument “has yet to score him a single victory" is correct, but only because there has never been a ruling on his argument.

Apuzzo has never had a chance to impeach Obama’s alleged Factcheck COLB in any court case with his argument and evidence because that COLB has never been entered into evidence by Obama or the DOJ.

It appears only the quo warranto suggested by Judge Carter in the correct venue would give the opportunity for Apuzzo or Donofrio to challenge the self-authentication of any HI COLB placed into evidence.

969 posted on 02/25/2010 2:49:46 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 952 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson