Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

Give me the link, please. But, what is your best document? if you could only take one or two things into court, what’s your very best of the best.

parsy, who says, Pssss! I think BP2 knows we’re coming for him. He’s done took off somewhere.


891 posted on 02/25/2010 12:44:56 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies ]


To: parsifal

http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/

I can’t really say what’s the best of the best. What I’ve got is a bunch of small dots of ink. Any one by itself can be overlooked, but when you put them all together it makes a definite image. The points I’ve made are the more significant bits from a large pile of other similar stuff.
In fact, I’ve got more that I could and should post.

One of the biggies is something you poo-poohed as a SNAFU. But the one instance of the DOH and OIP both confirming that Obama’s BC is amended is not the only one; I should probably post the other. The fact that both of those requests were appealed to the OIP and the OIP, who has the duty to determine whether a request is given a proper response, agreed that it was a denial of documents in existence rules out the SNAFU explanation.

The OIP letter that was written by OIP Director Paul Tsukiyama hasn’t been posted yet but is especially compelling because he is the person who had just written the UIPA booklet a month or two earlier - describing how the FIRST STEP in answering a UIPA request is to see whether the document even exists; if it doesn’t the agency is to check the box saying the record doesn’t exist and that’s the end of it.

The guy who wrote that said that the DOH had given a proper response when they denied access to Obama’s supplementary documents to support the claims on the birth certificate. Supplementary claims are only needed to amend a BC or if the BC is made on the basis of claims for an unattended birth.

The fact that the DOH illegally hid their Administrative Rules for over a year even though they were being pestered mercilessly to post them as required by law tells me that this is a deliberate course they’ve taken.

There’s just way too much to narrow down. But those 2 points speak volumes.


901 posted on 02/25/2010 1:02:29 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 891 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson