[parsifal]

I went back to see exactly what you were talking about. The image of the COLB could only be entered into evidence as what it is, a photograph of a thing. If in court, the document itself would be presented into evidence. Some courts would want a certified copy. Some wouldn’t. But as evidence, oh yes the COLB could be easily introduced and accepted.

parsy, who went back

[BP2]

I went back to see exactly what you were talking about. The image of the COLB could only be entered into evidence as what it is, a photograph of a thing.

OMG - BWA-HA-HA!

SO Parsley, you're saying that if you went to Court with a PICTURE of something like say, a Contract — when you can just as easily provide the judge with an notarized and actual HARD COPY of the Contract — the judge wouldn't laugh his ass off at you and refuse it as proper prima facie??!

Excuse me ...

and LMAO!!!

So Parsley, when you got your first Passport, did you try this technique by submitting a PHOTO of your "birth certificate"?

[edge919]

But as evidence, oh yes the COLB could be easily introduced and accepted.

If the COLB was such good evidence, why hasn't it been introduced at any of the court cases??