If the COLB was such good evidence, why hasn't it been introduced at any of the court cases??
The bozos cannot answer the question with any credible answer.
Because the Birther cases have been so pathetically weak, they never get to that phase. They have been getting thrown out at a very early, and embarrassing stage of litigation.
And here’s the other thing. There is practically no evidence for the Birthers to present. Orly presented TWO PHONY KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATES. There has been no testimony for the Birthers to present. Frankly, they don’t have a case.
And if it ever did, on the basis he wasn’t born in Hawaii, the attorney for Obama would make a Motion for Summary Judgment, attach a certified copy of the COLB to it, an affidavit to lay foundation, and prsent that to the court. It would probably be granted.
I do not say this to be hurtful, but....There is more evidence for Aliens visiting Roswell in 1947, than there is for the Birhters. You have a newspaper, some testimony that people seen dead alien bodies, some photographs.
There is more evidence that Fred Prumpl was abducted by aliens, and probed, than there is for the Birthers. Fred can give an affidavit that he was picked up. Who knows, Fred might even believe it. But Fred would at least have ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE. He might even get a doctor to swear that Fred has a sore butt. That would be two pieces of evidence.
Birthers do not even have this much. All the time. All the carrying on. All the martyrdom. All the BS. And they do not have ONE SINGLE SOLITARY PIECE OF EVIDENCE.
parsy, who’s been sitting so long, his rear end is sore, but he wasn’t abducted by aliens