[butterdezillion]

Come off it. Okubo said the “date filed” field on the COLB’s is the date they give the certificate a number at the state registrar’s office.

That being the case, the certificate number and date filed for the Factcheck COLB are incompatible. Another sign of forgery.

[EnderWiggins]

"Come off it. Okubo said the “date filed” field on the COLB’s is the date they give the certificate a number at the state registrar’s office."

Sure she did. She also said a bunch of other stuff in that same paragraph that makes no sense and cannot be reconciled with the actual COLBs and long forms that we are all familiar with. You can't just pick out one phrase from a garbled response and pretend that the response is not garbled.

You yourself interpreted her as meaning that COLBs once had two different dates on them, one for accepted and one for filed. We both know that no such COLB version ever existed... certainly you have never seen one. See? Her response was so garbled that she even confused you!!

She clearly does not have any idea of what the process was in 1961, and neither do you. Therefore your elaborate theory of a coded admission of forgery based on this response from her is absurd on its face.