[butterdezillion]

Obama won’t admit that he wrote that letter that has his signature and the White House seal.

Why do you think that is?

If Obama didn’t write it, then his good pal Neil Abercrombie was passing off a forgery for charity fraud purposes. I would think Obama would really, really want to keep his good buddy from being accused of charity fraud - which Obama could easily do simply by admitting that he signed the letter.

Why won’t he?

[EnderWiggins]

"Obama won’t admit that he wrote that letter that has his signature and the White House seal.

Why do you think that is?"

You mean other than because it already has his signature and the White House seal?

The very fact that you demand yet another level of confirmation would certainly be among the very good reasons reasons he has not. You would simply then demand a video confirming that he confirmed it. And once you got that, you'd demand a DNA test of the paper to see if he had ever actually touched it.

This is why the law sets the standards for "legal proof" ahead of time. So we know when the "proof" is good enough that we can then ignore unreasonable demands for more.

Reasonable people would say that Obama's signature and the White House Stationary was good enough evidence that a nice letter to a hospital on its centennial is authentic.

"If Obama didn’t write it, then his good pal Neil Abercrombie was passing off a forgery for charity fraud purposes. I would think Obama would really, really want to keep his good buddy from being accused of charity fraud - which Obama could easily do simply by admitting that he signed the letter."

Accused by who? Birthers?

I'm pretty confident that neither Obama nor Abercrombie are too concerned about Birther accusations of "forgery for charity fraud."

Now... if you have any evidence that is not authentic, then put that on your growing list of criminal complaints you can file and blow right by the standing issue as if it never even existed.