[EnderWiggins]

"Diagnostic only of a probability that the textiles in the two different images from Orly and the alleged punk came, perhaps, from the same production facility, but weave is no proof at all that two separate images are of the same exact textile item."

Again... you are completely wrong and completely miss the point. I am not speaking of the general weave of a type of cloth. I am speaking of the specific and unique weave that makes each and every piece of cloth individually identifiable. The Punkster released THE SAME PHOTOGRAPH that Orly did, but at a higher resolution. It is not just a similar cloth from the same production facility... it is the identical piece of fabric in the identical photograph. The unique weave of that specific piece of cloth is only one of the many features that prove it.

[Seizethecarp]

“The Punkster released THE SAME PHOTOGRAPH that Orly did, but at a higher resolution. It is not just a similar cloth from the same production facility... it is the identical piece of fabric in the identical photograph.”

I do not recall seeing a photograph from the punkster that was the “same” as Orly's image. I posted BP2’s comparison of two similar images, which are the only ones I am aware of.

The punkster could easily have staged his/her photo to look as close as possible to Orly's image after reproducing Orly's image as closely as possible to create a hoax punk.

If you post a link to a punkster image that is in fact literally the same as Orly's (without the schmutz as you claim), I would be very interested and it could well shift the relative probabilities that I currently assign to the two images.