[Seizethecarp]

“The hoaxer was absolutely the source of it, as proven by the fact that he/she produced the highest resolution copy (i.e. the original) of the photograph that Orly first published, along with other photographs taken on the same unique background as the Orly photo.”

I missed that. Link please!

What I saw from the hoaxer was a very high resolution picture of his forgery of Orly's Lavender document placed on a non-unique textile, possibly even the exact pattern from the same source, but hardly conclusively unique. Just because two manufactured textiles look the same doesn't prove they are singularly the same item.

The resolution was so high that clear discrepancies between the hoax forgery image and the Lavender image were conclusive including spelling mistakes.

[EnderWiggins]

"What I saw from the hoaxer was a very high resolution picture of his forgery of Orly's Lavender document placed on a non-unique textile, possibly even the exact pattern from the same source, but hardly conclusively unique. Just because two manufactured textiles look the same doesn't prove they are singularly the same item."

What you missed was that one of them was the identical photograph that Orly and WND released... but higher resolution than what either of them possessed. The Punker's images are themselves no longer on line, but he/she originally released them here:

http://fearlessblogging.com/post/view/3037

I'm sure that somebody on FR got copies before the hosting site went belly up.

"The resolution was so high that clear discrepancies between the hoax forgery image and the Lavender image were conclusive including spelling mistakes."

LOL... the spelling mistake that actually did exist on the fake BC is actually another peice of proof that Orly's was a fake. If you look on the Orly copy, that exact spot of the misspelling is covered up on the photo he/she gave to Orly by a piece of "smutz." I don't know what it was... Chocolate? Tobacco? But the presence of the misspelling on the exact spot as the glop of whatever on Orly's photo is actually further evidence that it's the same document, that the forger deliberately covered up the misspelling, and that Orly was Punked.

Add to it that the poor Australian guy whose BC was used to make the forgery was publicly interviewed, and the forgery is inescapable.

But you still believe it anyway. Because Birther lies never die.