[EnderWiggins]

"What I saw from the hoaxer was a very high resolution picture of his forgery of Orly's Lavender document placed on a non-unique textile, possibly even the exact pattern from the same source, but hardly conclusively unique. Just because two manufactured textiles look the same doesn't prove they are singularly the same item."

What you missed was that one of them was the identical photograph that Orly and WND released... but higher resolution than what either of them possessed. The Punker's images are themselves no longer on line, but he/she originally released them here:

http://fearlessblogging.com/post/view/3037

I'm sure that somebody on FR got copies before the hosting site went belly up.

"The resolution was so high that clear discrepancies between the hoax forgery image and the Lavender image were conclusive including spelling mistakes."

LOL... the spelling mistake that actually did exist on the fake BC is actually another peice of proof that Orly's was a fake. If you look on the Orly copy, that exact spot of the misspelling is covered up on the photo he/she gave to Orly by a piece of "smutz." I don't know what it was... Chocolate? Tobacco? But the presence of the misspelling on the exact spot as the glop of whatever on Orly's photo is actually further evidence that it's the same document, that the forger deliberately covered up the misspelling, and that Orly was Punked.

Add to it that the poor Australian guy whose BC was used to make the forgery was publicly interviewed, and the forgery is inescapable.

But you still believe it anyway. Because Birther lies never die.

[Seizethecarp]

“LOL... the spelling mistake that actually did exist on the fake BC is actually another peice of proof that Orly's was a fake. If you look on the Orly copy, that exact spot of the misspelling is covered up on the photo he/she gave to Orly by a piece of “smutz.” I don't know what it was... Chocolate? Tobacco? But the presence of the misspelling on the exact spot as the glop of whatever on Orly's photo is actually further evidence that it's the same document, that the forger deliberately covered up the misspelling, and that Orly was Punked.

“Add to it that the poor Australian guy whose BC was used to make the forgery was publicly interviewed, and the forgery is inescapable.

“But you still believe it anyway. Because Birther lies never die.”

The Lavender hoax forger of Orly's image was apparently a young Obot pup who was unfamiliar with the word “maiden” and misspelled it in high resolution on his/her forgery.

Under high resolution on the Orly Lavender image, the schmutz can be clearly seen to only partially obscure the correctly spelled word “maiden”, not the Obot’s incorrect spelling. The Lavender hoax image is not exactly the same as Orley’s image as you claim, but only very similar.

The Australian individual whose BC is claimed to be the model for the Orly image has a controversial history and a person with a very similar name, perhaps a relative, was connected to the Obama campaign in the US, if I remember correctly.

I never have said that I “believe” the Lavender, Blaine or Lucas Smith CPGH BCs to be genuine. I only make my personal assessment as to probability that they are genuine or fake, which I have always kept to myself.

You are the one who is making firm declarations that all of these BCs are fake and the the HI COLB “proves” Obama was born in HI. I make no declarations of belief or disbelief about any of these images. I do investigate individual features of each image and attempt to verify them to my satisfaction and I publicly affirm and defend some of those features while withholding opinion on each image.

The only indisputable fact is that Obama has not authorized HI to release his original vital records which would reveal an actual claimed physical birth address and witnesses.

The alleged HI COLB has never been confirmed to be genuine by HI officials and has never been placed into evidence (claims in Obama defense motions and by Factcheck don't count).