[EnderWiggins]

"I don't know whether the Lavender BC is real or not, but the hoaxer wasn't the source of it, from the analysis done here."

Thank you for proving my point so directly. The hoaxer was absolutely the source of it, as proven by the fact that he/she produced the highest resolution copy (i.e. the original) of the photograph that Orly first published, along with other photographs taken on the same unique background as the Orly photo.

Like I said... even Lucas Smith admitting his forgery would not convince a Birther that it was fake. As we all know, a Birther lie never dies.

[Seizethecarp]

“The hoaxer was absolutely the source of it, as proven by the fact that he/she produced the highest resolution copy (i.e. the original) of the photograph that Orly first published, along with other photographs taken on the same unique background as the Orly photo.”

I missed that. Link please!

What I saw from the hoaxer was a very high resolution picture of his forgery of Orly's Lavender document placed on a non-unique textile, possibly even the exact pattern from the same source, but hardly conclusively unique. Just because two manufactured textiles look the same doesn't prove they are singularly the same item.

The resolution was so high that clear discrepancies between the hoax forgery image and the Lavender image were conclusive including spelling mistakes.