[Seizethecarp]

"Well... you are correct to a point. These "discrepancies" are not proof of anything, especially to a Birther. After all, a lot of Birthers are still defending the original Fake Kenyan BC that Orly first presented in court, even after the actual forger came out and published (what I will not dare to offend you by calling "proof") that is was a punk."

You appear to have been taken in by the hoax punking of the Lavender BC, which astute FReepers revealed by examining closely the features of the claimed hoax image compared to clean images of the Lavender BC that were archived by FReepers when it was first posted.

I don't know whether the Lavender BC is real or not, but the hoaxer wasn't the source of it, from the analysis done here (somewhere in the 10,000+ comments):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?q=1&;page=1

[EnderWiggins]

"I don't know whether the Lavender BC is real or not, but the hoaxer wasn't the source of it, from the analysis done here."

Thank you for proving my point so directly. The hoaxer was absolutely the source of it, as proven by the fact that he/she produced the highest resolution copy (i.e. the original) of the photograph that Orly first published, along with other photographs taken on the same unique background as the Orly photo.

Like I said... even Lucas Smith admitting his forgery would not convince a Birther that it was fake. As we all know, a Birther lie never dies.