[EnderWiggins]

"You have reasonable suspicions about conflicting details, but you persist in falsely claiming that your personal suspicions regarding newspaper discrepancies that go both ways “prove” something."

Well... you are correct to a point. These "discrepancies" are not proof of anything, especially to a Birther. After all, a lot of Birthers are still defending the original Fake Kenyan BC that Orly first presented in court, even after the actual forger came out and published (what I will not dare to offend you by calling "proof") that is was a punk. So we all know that the fine upstanding convicted felon and forger Lucas Smith could not himself prove his a fake even if he admitted it.

"Your suspicions about mere discrepancies for which there are alternate exculpatory explanations prove nothing, in my opinion."

I think he's still willing to sell the thing. How much money you willing to use to back up your confidence in the thing?

[Seizethecarp]

"Well... you are correct to a point. These "discrepancies" are not proof of anything, especially to a Birther. After all, a lot of Birthers are still defending the original Fake Kenyan BC that Orly first presented in court, even after the actual forger came out and published (what I will not dare to offend you by calling "proof") that is was a punk."

You appear to have been taken in by the hoax punking of the Lavender BC, which astute FReepers revealed by examining closely the features of the claimed hoax image compared to clean images of the Lavender BC that were archived by FReepers when it was first posted.

I don't know whether the Lavender BC is real or not, but the hoaxer wasn't the source of it, from the analysis done here (somewhere in the 10,000+ comments):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?q=1&;page=1