[edge919]

inventing a whole new set of verification requirements

Since when is identifying a a document a 'whole new set of verification requirements'?? You're babbling.

Her testimony is what it is. It is authoritative.

Nonsense. A lack of specificity undermines her authority and appears evasive, devolving into nothing more that pretentious hearsay. She has the broad authority to document her response fully. Failure to do so makes her statement worthless. It has no more value than telling us she verified the existence of bigfoot.

[EnderWiggins]

"Since when is identifying a a document a 'whole new set of verification requirements'?? You're babbling."

No. I'm focusing.

"Original birth certificate" fully identifies the document. You were doing the knee-jerk Birther thing of going further and demanding access to irrelevant information that you're not allowed by law to see.

"Nonsense. A lack of specificity undermines her authority and appears evasive, devolving into nothing more that pretentious hearsay."

What fascinatingly weird legal theories you guys keep coming up with. Go read the Federal Rules of Evidence, and then get a clue.

There is no lack of specificity here. There is merely the refusal of Birthers to accept that her statements directly and authoritatively eviscerate your narrative.