Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919
"Since when is identifying a a document a 'whole new set of verification requirements'?? You're babbling."

No. I'm focusing.

"Original birth certificate" fully identifies the document. You were doing the knee-jerk Birther thing of going further and demanding access to irrelevant information that you're not allowed by law to see.

"Nonsense. A lack of specificity undermines her authority and appears evasive, devolving into nothing more that pretentious hearsay."

What fascinatingly weird legal theories you guys keep coming up with. Go read the Federal Rules of Evidence, and then get a clue.

There is no lack of specificity here. There is merely the refusal of Birthers to accept that her statements directly and authoritatively eviscerate your narrative.
2,347 posted on 03/02/2010 2:37:28 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2346 | View Replies ]


To: EnderWiggins
"Original birth certificate" fully identifies the document.

Fukino didn't cite the "original birth certificate" as the document that allegedly verified Obama being born in Hawaii. Please find a direct quote that includes both together.

Go read the Federal Rules of Evidence ...

For what?? No evidence has been presented in court.

2,352 posted on 03/02/2010 3:18:22 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson