Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: EnderWiggins
But sorry, a reference to "vital records" is simply common usage for a category of document.

Sorry, but this argument is pure nonsense. Fukino had no problem being specific in her previous statement. She had no reason to be vague in her second, unless she was talking about diffent documents. And she emphasized the vital records statement was separate from the birth certificate statement. The claim of Hawaiian birth is not based on the original birth certificate, else she would have said so.

In point of fact (and it's a shame I have to point this out to you so many times) the only document she actually cited at all was his "original birth certificate."

Only to the extent that the state of Hawaii has one on file. She said nothing about the contents of this document nor whether she actually looked at it or even that she read it. She definitely avoided saying that its contents matched the same contents in the alleged COLB. No, you've fallen prey to classic double-speak or are simply reading something between the lines that was never stated. All you have is faith, not fact.

2,332 posted on 03/02/2010 12:19:11 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2331 | View Replies ]


To: edge919
"Sorry, but this argument is pure nonsense. Fukino had no problem being specific in her previous statement. She had no reason to be vague in her second, unless she was talking about diffent documents."

Then it is a very good thing that she was not vague.

The second statement is in fact far more explicit, given the Birther inability to understand what she said in her first; i.e. that Obama was born in Hawaii, and that he is a natural born citizen.

Of course, we all know (as you so well demonstrate) that Birthers do not care what people say. They care only about what they want them to say, and will show complete shamelessness in reinterpreting them beyond recognition.

It's like every time Orly Taitz announced things like "Chief Justice Roberts promised" her case would be heard by SCOTUS, or when she told the DC Tea Party that she had been granted discovery in the Barnett Case within 30 days, or that her case had been scheduled for arguments on... pick an date. In ever case she was deluding herself, as the transcripts and the results show.

Delusion is central to the Birther mythos. Without it, you would have nothing to write about.
2,338 posted on 03/02/2010 1:05:12 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2332 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson