[EnderWiggins]

"Sorry, but this argument is pure nonsense. Fukino had no problem being specific in her previous statement. She had no reason to be vague in her second, unless she was talking about diffent documents."

Then it is a very good thing that she was not vague.

The second statement is in fact far more explicit, given the Birther inability to understand what she said in her first; i.e. that Obama was born in Hawaii, and that he is a natural born citizen.

Of course, we all know (as you so well demonstrate) that Birthers do not care what people say. They care only about what they want them to say, and will show complete shamelessness in reinterpreting them beyond recognition.

It's like every time Orly Taitz announced things like "Chief Justice Roberts promised" her case would be heard by SCOTUS, or when she told the DC Tea Party that she had been granted discovery in the Barnett Case within 30 days, or that her case had been scheduled for arguments on... pick an date. In ever case she was deluding herself, as the transcripts and the results show.

Delusion is central to the Birther mythos. Without it, you would have nothing to write about.

[edge919]

Then it is a very good thing that she was not vague.

Since you claims she wasn't vague, then you can tell me how many documents she was referring to, the title of each of document, when each was dated and by whom they are signed. Until you can do that, you're simply in hopeless denial (which we already know). So please, let's not act like this is something that it's not.