Replies

Beeps, Dude! If you increase the point size and bold, it does not magically transform “blather” into “truth”.

Don't worry, Parsley. It may be HTML-intensive, but it's still the truth! It's MOST CERTAINLY the truth, as opposed to your elusive and Sasquatch-like Obama COLB. Oh, hey ... I saw a "certified" photo of one of Sasquatch's footprints on Ebay just now if you want to buy that, too. LOL!

Ya know ... I keep hoping that if you After-Birther kooks can SEE it well enough, it might actually sink in how NUTS you Conspiracy Theorists are in actually believing in Obama’s “birth certificate.”

You simpletons saw it on the Internet, and it's from HIGHLY-dubious sources, yet you say it's definitely FOR REAL anyway — LOL!
IT'S JUST AS REAL AS AL GORE'S GLOBAL WARMING!!!
But alas, your dense, pointed heads just are too thick to seep it in! We keep trying to help open your eyes to be wiser about the illogical, but you After-Birthers are punch-drinking TRUE BELIEVERS and hard to get through to.

It's kinda like the futility of watching Obama on TV and trying to adjust the BRIGHTNESS and SHARPNESS knobs to make him smarter ... it just does NOT make a damn bit of difference !!!

Oh, and once again ... here’s your sign:

FYI ... just checking if it appears, as it does to me, that the following par. from above merely represents the assertions of the O-fendant via his/our DOJ attorneys .. with as yet no appurtenant discovery proceedings .. as seems to be supported here.

"To the extent this paragraph alleges that President Obama’s birth certificate has not been released to the public, that allegation is denied. To the extent this paragraph alleges that the birth certificate released to the public at the direction of President Obama is not a valid birth certificate or that such certificate is not sufficient proof of U.S. citizenship, those allegations are denied."

And .. the same tune they sing here:

35. Allegations concerning President Obama are subject to a pending motion to dismiss, and no response is therefore required. To the extent this paragraph alleges that the birth certificate released to the public at the direction of President Obama is not a valid birth certificate or that such certificate is not sufficient proof of U.S. citizenship, those allegations are denied.

To the extent this paragraph alleges that President Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, the allegation is denied. Further, paragraph 35 contains conclusions of law, not factual allegations requiring a response, and on that basis, Defendants deny.

38. Allegations concerning President Obama are subject to a pending motion to dismiss, and no response is therefore required. To the extent this paragraph refers to a document,Defendants refer the Court to the document for a complete and accurate representation of its contents. To the extent this paragraph alleges that Lolo Soetoro is or ever was President Obama’s father by birth or adoption, that allegation is denied. To the extent this paragraph alleges that President Obama is or ever was a practicing Muslim, that allegation is denied.

The last blip in the Strunk case appears to be this, just before Exhibit 13, Pg. 223:

Docket Text:

MINUTE ORDER granting Motion to Stay Discovery. No Discovery shall take place until further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 6/19/2009

However, I could have missed finding the last legal event.