Some of us challenge birther claims because we believe the incorrect information damages the credibility of FR as a whole.
~~~~
Ahem .... if this is a subject you truly find that damaging to the place, as you claim (along with others feigning the same disingenuous protectiveness) one would expect that these threads would be the very LAST place to which you’d be drawn like a magnet as you are, just like regular folks avoid situations they find irksome and disagreeable to them in their real lives.
I’m sure the boss here would love to know all your efforts to protect the place so he could acknowledge and thank you.
~~~
“...because we see illogical conclusions and/or total delusion running rampant at FR.”
If there is something ‘running rampant,’ you’re sure not a bystander.
You might just consider that to be *your* interpretation of a difference of opinion regarding Constitutional integrity and survival.
The claim that they are protecting FR is a false one.
To: pissant
Release the long form!
131 posted on Friday, February 12, 2010 8:28:17 PM by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Poppycock. Incorrect information should be corrected not left to stand unchallenged. Jimrob knows my position on this subject because I’ve discussed it with him. He allows the debate. When something has been debunked and shown to be false, it’s not a matter of my personal interpretation. For example, that ridiculous claim that American travel to Pakistan in 1981 was banned has been debunked. Yet some birthers continue to perpetuate that stupid rumor as fact. Claims like that NEED to be challenged so we don’t look like idiots. And that’s just one example.