It would be easier and safer just to show the 100% correct physical copy to McCain's lawyers and the WSJ and other press. That would have ended the issue permanently.
Before the 2008 presidential election only political neophytes were aware of the issue at all. After the election the continued presence of the eligibility issue for Obama only increased the Administration's opposition's intensity, it does not help boost democratic turnout.
You have the evidence thing backwards, a DC Quo Warrento case, once launched by a DC judge, would force discovery.
Then the 2008 Campaign COLB will be an issue and will force Obama to produce a Onaka DOH certified physical copy of what ever is on Obama’s actual COLB data, as well as all his other ID documents IMHO, e.g. passport(s).
It is The special nature of a DC Quo Warrento case that will spotlight all the ID document issues. I have doubts that the Judge will accept Orly as an "interested" party as detailed by congressional statute authorizing DC courts to use Quo Warrento granted powers. However, it can't be ruled out because another judge has sanctioned her, challenging her to put up or shut up. The DC Judge has Jurisdiction. The Justice department has allready admitted that in Obama v Barnett. Even to have got to the point of a Quo Warrento case being filed in DC is proof that using a Composite made up COLB in 2008 was a crazy risk to take. Unless revealing the actual COLB data would have been worse.
Which all boils down to the same thing. If any case against Obama gets past the “Git this Dreck outta my court room!” phase, Obama will present a COLB, probably a certified one. Maybe presented by an Hawaiian state official. That will be the end of the story.
I CAN STILL SEE NO BASIS FOR INTRODUCING THE ALLEGED PHONY INTERNET COPY INTO THE COURT AS EVIDENCE. (WINK....WINK....)
parsy, who is winking and kicking your leg under the table....