Which all boils down to the same thing. If any case against Obama gets past the “Git this Dreck outta my court room!” phase, Obama will present a COLB, probably a certified one. Maybe presented by an Hawaiian state official. That will be the end of the story.
I CAN STILL SEE NO BASIS FOR INTRODUCING THE ALLEGED PHONY INTERNET COPY INTO THE COURT AS EVIDENCE. (WINK....WINK....)
parsy, who is winking and kicking your leg under the table....
However, the time line of the 2008 COLB and its role in the presidential campaign would logically figure in the plaintiff's side's presentation in Discovery conference as a means of plaintiffs justifying a wide discovery of Obama’s documentation to the presiding judge.
If a Que Warrento case advances, it goes to jury trial. Plaintiff's lawyer can then show the difference in the seals between a real certified Hawaii DOH COLB of the year the Obama says Hawaii produced his and the weird “composite” presented to the American people in 2008.
Or at least, the above is my take on it. My Interpretaion of the rules for Quo Warrento is based on Leo Donofrio’s explanations on his Blog.