Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato
Unless challenged. You do understand the meaning, both literal and legal, of prima-faciedo you not?

Yes. The problem is, birthers have no evidence with which to challange it.

If, after two years, birthers haven't been able to produce a shred of evidence that bambi was born outside Hawaii, what makes you think they could produce it now, or any time in the future?

Face it. You've got nothing.

1,723 posted on 02/26/2010 11:22:11 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1712 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity

Your boy is going down in 2012. Suck it up, accept it. He most likely will come up with an excuse not to run again, and if he doesn’t he will be exposed and the end result will be the same. He’s done. Over. Finished.


1,725 posted on 02/26/2010 11:25:27 PM PST by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1723 | View Replies ]

To: curiosity

We have produced proof that the claims in Hawaii that he was born in Hawaii do not qualify as prima facie evidence.

IOW, the Kenyan birth certificates have just as much legal veracity as everything in Hawaii’s Department of Health.

We aren’t able to look and see what’s in Kenya or to have Kenya tell us whether the indexed location on the Kenya BC is accurate so we have no way of producing proof positive of a birth in Kenya (much less Canada).

But we have done that process with Hawaii and we know that what is there does NOT pass legal muster.

I’d say that’s serious.


1,749 posted on 02/27/2010 7:14:41 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1723 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson